Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:47 pmby Asim
I'd maybe go along once or twice if a game was close by, and the admission prices were directly exchanged from what they'd have been in rupees in India to sterling.
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:06 pmby The Penguin
Lord_Percy wrote:
It's also less of a difference time wise isn't it? Makes it even more suitable imo.
Good. I couldn't bear it if we have that circus here.
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:31 pmby oggy123
wouldbe a good thing imo think of the crowa the revenue for the countys hosting the matche
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:00 pmby EHW
will be a complete disaster IMO.
The weather for one is a major negative for playing in April.
Can the ECB guarantee security in the UK?
SKY wont like it, and seeing as though SKY are the only serious broadcaster the ECB has on its books, they would be daft to risk that relationship at the moment.
The only positive is to get some leverage over the Indian Cricket board in the future.
Posted:
Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:11 pmby oggy123
security wont be a problem over here the only problem would be the weather but i thinjk its worth the risk
Posted:
Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:11 amby The Penguin
espanyolswan wrote:
Surely any Premier League game or final at Wembley is much more likely to be a terrorist target than a few thousand people shivering watching 22 over paid pre-madonnas.
irony detector going off the scale....