Crowd : Mon Apr 18, 2016 1:17 pm  

Attendance of 527!!! Is this something to worry about?

This is the 2nd lowest crowd since the start of 2009. (lowest 526 v swinton Feb 2013)

GF announced that there had been an increase in player costs this season but if crowds stay low will money add up?

Re: Crowd : Tue Apr 19, 2016 7:10 am  

3rd game running playing teams that do not bring more than a car full of fans. Plus 3rd funding where we are going to soundly beat a team.

Re: Crowd : Tue Apr 19, 2016 7:50 am  

Yeah I see your point, I guess its why its so important we get out of this division (which I don't think will be as easy as it sounds)

Re: Crowd : Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:36 pm  

Yes you are correct it wont be easy gettingout of this division considering Toulouse are fulltime.

Re: Crowd : Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:26 pm  

Make it free and still the crowds wouldn't improve by many.
There are reasons, not all entirely of the clubs making.

Re: Crowd : Fri Apr 22, 2016 6:44 am  

What reasons are the clubs fault for poor crowds then

Re: Crowd : Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:23 pm  

Cross Hills Cougar wrote:

What reasons are the clubs fault for poor crowds then

You actually have to ask!!

Re: Crowd : Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:51 pm  

Leaguefan wrote:

You actually have to ask!!

Yes he does, maybe you can enlighten the uninitiated readers !always happy to read other peoples opinions and reasoning

Re: Crowd : Sun May 01, 2016 11:51 am  

Dare I even suggest: 'TEAM SELECTION'?

Why on earth didn't our 'excellent' coach select players who can actually run fast?

Cherryholme and Rawlins were completely invisible yesterday and real 'plodders' who ran and died with the ball. As for Oakes, where was Peltier (apart from carrying the water)?

On a synthetic pitch, why didn't our coach select our fastest players?

Why did the ball rarely get out to the wings and, from memory, never to White?

All I can say is that it's a good job that we have so many decent players who don't need coaching as it appears that they don't get any.

Could that be a reason for the decline in crowds? This and the Rugby Football League's structure of the competitions?

If, and it really is a BIG IF, we do manage to get promotion then a 'new brush' needs to be given the chance.

Re: Crowd : Sun May 01, 2016 9:09 pm  

666 wrote:

Dare I even suggest: 'TEAM SELECTION'?

Why on earth didn't our 'excellent' coach select players who can actually run fast?

Cherryholme and Rawlins were completely invisible yesterday and real 'plodders' who ran and died with the ball. As for Oakes, where was Peltier (apart from carrying the water)?

On a synthetic pitch, why didn't our coach select our fastest players?

Why did the ball rarely get out to the wings and, from memory, never to White?

All I can say is that it's a good job that we have so many decent players who don't need coaching as it appears that they don't get any.

Could that be a reason for the decline in crowds? This and the Rugby Football League's structure of the competitions?

If, and it really is a BIG IF, we do manage to get promotion then a 'new brush' needs to be given the chance.

So no positives to take from the fact. That the team won through to a final on a very emotional game.