Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:09 am  

Oh and Dreamer is 666 a really angry person with a seriously weak argument?

I dont think so but based on your statement I may be wrong as I dont have all the facts.

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:26 pm  

Fossil wrote:

Oh and Dreamer is 666 a really angry person with a seriously weak argument?

If you are going to use my quote back at me at least don't add words for dramatic effect
I don't know "666", so I'm not sure if he (she) is an angry person. I can only assume that having watched what's happened to his (her) club over the last few years has made him (her) at least moderately miffed.

Fossil wrote:

I dont think so but based on your statement I may be wrong as I dont have all the facts.

Are these fact, facts, poetic license facts, or facts that in fact aren't facts.

Can you answer the question that you ignored earlier?
You wrote:

Fossil wrote:

The liabilty came from signing a strong squad and failing to see sufficient return

I said:

dreamer wrote:

Why did we get insufficient return? Lack of fans and sponsors? If so why?

I really don't want to get involved in a slanging match here. As I said earlier, members of Neils family are bound to get emotional when discussing such issues. Sometimes it needs an element of clinical detachment to see where the problem(s) lay. Neil believed in what he was doing, but in my opinion went about it the wrong way.

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:45 pm  

Dreamer you misunderstood it was humor. I used capitals, 666 used extra large bold capitals hence "really and seriously" merely expanding on your rhetoric. It seemed fair that you had a little fish on this minor point so I joined in.

Why did Cougars get insufficient return, big question and I can’t answer it and don’t want to I started this, once again to defend me and I apologise to my father for being drawn into defending him I should know better.

However could have just been too much for Neil and Colin, why they were so foolishly trying to manage it for people who wanted them out and after retirement age I do not know, I wouldn’t have done it.

Wait a minute love of the Keighley Cougars and rugby league.

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:48 pm  

Oh and let me ask a question 666, how many times was Neil Spencer a director of the club when it folded?

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:04 pm  

Incidentally, if you are new to internet forums there are two things you should bear in mind: using capitals ie "FACT" is the equivalent of shouting in the real world, using the word FACT (in capitals) is used by angry people with a weak argument.

Just for fun explain this sentence to me. Are you saying you find I am a fool who has no experience on internet forums, or are you giving advice that with the strong argument I have I should not spoil it by putting words in capitals, or are you saying that I have a weak argument and the capitals prove this and you believe I was aware of the way capitals are taken but thought you would point it out to me anyway to try and make me look foolish, or are you just saying I am a angry person with a weak argument. I get the feeling the being helpful option is off the table so it must be one of the more lets be nasty for nasties sake options.

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:26 pm  

Fossil wrote:

Just for fun explain this sentence to me. Are you saying you find I am a fool who has no experience on internet forums, or are you giving advice that with the strong argument I have I should not spoil it by putting words in capitals, or are you saying that I have a weak argument and the capitals prove this and you believe I was aware of the way capitals are taken but thought you would point it out to me anyway to try and make me look foolish, or are you just saying I am a angry person with a weak argument. I get the feeling the being helpful option is off the table so it must be one of the more lets be nasty for nasties sake options.

At the time I read your first post you only had two or three posts to your name so I assumed you were a newbie.

I was trying to be helpful with a bit of humour thrown in but hey, take it anyway you want.

If you use the wider RLFANS site you will notice that when the word FACT is used in captitals it is taken with a pinch of salt by other users. Just typing FACT after a statement does not make it so.

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:31 pm  

Now that actually was helpful, thank you.

The forum I go on there are only two rules, rule one you cant go too far, rule two, if you go too far refer to rule one.

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm  

http://z3.invisionfree.com/PP_and_A_For ... howforum=1

http://z3.invisionfree.com/PP_and_A_For ... howforum=1

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:03 pm  

Fossil wrote: Now that actually was helpful, thank you. The forum I go on there are only two rules, rule one you cant go too far, rule two, if you go too far refer to rule one. There are a lot more than two on here. You can read them all here if you wish.

Fossil wrote: Now that actually was helpful, thank you. The forum I go on there are only two rules, rule one you cant go too far, rule two, if you go too far refer to rule one. There are a lot more than two on here. You can read them all here if you wish.

Re: Facts??? : Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:19 pm  

I did read them previously and feel free to tell me if I have breached any of them. The link to another rugby league site may be a breach and i will remove it if you would like it is where then Pennine Rugby league lunatics vent themselves, I dont generally take advantage of the liberal atitude they have but neither am I offend by it.