Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 9:31 am  

girl power wrote:

Neil is not a creditor fact!!!

He's a creditor.

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 10:30 am  

guess who wrote:

girl power wrote:

There is more that I am aware of but cannot publicly say

Ah, very intelligent response - the old "I know something you don't" trick

Do i sound like someone else in saying that, or am i dreaming

There is a difference between can not say and will not say

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 10:41 am  

aj cougar wrote:

He's a creditor.

I'm not an expert about the admin situation but I thought all debts were wiped clean.

Isn't it only the clubs vountary undertaking to pay back creditors IF the club makes a profit (and I think there were conditions). Not many RL clubs make a profit.

I have no problem with Neil as a fan, but the situation he put the club in is unacceptable - that is unless GW cares to tell us something we don't already know that mitigates this:wink:

If there is something that mitigates this then I would expect Neils "followers" to be shouting it loud and long.

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 12:19 pm  

I say again Neil is not a creditor, and as Dreamer says there is massive difference between cannot say and will not say, its a case of cannot say as told by the person who supplied the info.

If I could I would have posted to prove my point without doubt.

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 12:29 pm  

I found out that there were no directors of the club at Whitehaven and Neil was a representative of the club.

Can the club kindly confirm why by allowing this to happen knowing the feelings of fans, after all he is just a fan now so open this up to others if possible. I do not include myself in this.

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 12:35 pm  

Ouch........ be careful what you say.

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 12:49 pm  

Dreamer you have a point.am changing tack.

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 3:43 pm  

girl power wrote:

I say again Neil is not a creditor, and as Dreamer says there is massive difference between cannot say and will not say, its a case of cannot say as told by the person who supplied the info.

If I could I would have posted to prove my point without doubt.

He's listed as a creditor in the administrators proposals, alongside Farrar and Fawcett, local businesses, and the dreaded inland revenue.

It's in black and white.

Whether he'll ever get any money back is debatable, but he IS a creditor

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 4:06 pm  

AJ I am not disputing those you mentioned were on the proposals as creditors of cougars 2001 and any deal had to get acceptance of at least 75%to go for an iva of creditors which clearly was done, however once the organisation goes bust all debts are wiped clean including the tax bill.

Now the club is now a not for profit organisation any profits which for a rugby league club is small would be split 50% to club other to previous creditors but there is no obligation to do this but its more of goodwill gesture to keep locals sweet as.

Neil is not a creditor of cougars 2010.

Re: +1 : Wed May 12, 2010 4:48 pm  

In my opinion sending Neil Spencer as a rep for the club shows a mssive disregard by the new board towards some of the loyalest fans of the Cougars.