Re: Q and A with Michael Carter tomorrow (Friday) : Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:57 pm  

vastman wrote:

cosmicat wrote:

vastman wrote:

Why do we always assume the worst, nowhere does he say Murphy is going anywhere, yet it's assumed he is after ONE contract rebuffle. I swear some on here just love to feel hard done by.

It's very simple IMO where Murphy is concerned. He will stay another two years at least so long as the money is close and Trinity are on the up on the field. If we struggle again this year, and by that I don't mean so much points but the general team performances, he will be off like a shot.

Well tbf 9/10 most rumours regarding players are true you can liicky licky all you want he's gone trinity are a feeder club end of the day

Lets start with Gale

...and then let's work on the 20 others that have appeared on here in the last 3 month and been wrong.

Nobody got Smith, or Antoni or Langi this time around and one person got Proctor.

So as ever you have your demented old finger on the pulse. You meeting the delightful Carter family for Christmas drinkies this year to tell them how you feel? Or are you going to be as two faced as last time?

Never mentioned Gale or others I posted about Murphy get facts fake man

[PopTart]

Re: Q and A with Michael Carter tomorrow (Friday) : Thu Dec 22, 2022 1:43 pm  

cosmicat wrote:

vastman wrote:

cosmicat wrote:

vastman wrote:

Why do we always assume the worst, nowhere does he say Murphy is going anywhere, yet it's assumed he is after ONE contract rebuffle. I swear some on here just love to feel hard done by.

It's very simple IMO where Murphy is concerned. He will stay another two years at least so long as the money is close and Trinity are on the up on the field. If we struggle again this year, and by that I don't mean so much points but the general team performances, he will be off like a shot.

Well tbf 9/10 most rumours regarding players are true you can liicky licky all you want he's gone trinity are a feeder club end of the day

Lets start with Gale

...and then let's work on the 20 others that have appeared on here in the last 3 month and been wrong.

Nobody got Smith, or Antoni or Langi this time around and one person got Proctor.

So as ever you have your demented old finger on the pulse. You meeting the delightful Carter family for Christmas drinkies this year to tell them how you feel? Or are you going to be as two faced as last time?

Never mentioned Gale or others I posted about Murphy get facts fake man

You said 9/10 rumours are true. All he did was prove that wrong.

Re: Q and A with Michael Carter tomorrow (Friday) : Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:04 pm  

It is a near impossibility for us to compete on the player market front. Just look at Huddersfield for example, a club that was recently reported to have £ 20 million debt with most recent accounts showing in excess of £ 1 million trading loss for the year and yet they have just signed Bradford Academy player , Flanagan, paying an £ 85,000 transfer fee. Covid is not the reason clubs lost money, most clubs have lost money year on year for many seasons. As long as your Sugar Daddy is happy to cover the trading losses then plough on. Its the way of all pro clubs in most sports and the reality of it is that if one of us won £ 100 million on the lottery we would be happy to throw half a million / a million quid at Trinity a year to cover losses.

Re: Q and A with Michael Carter tomorrow (Friday) : Sat Dec 24, 2022 6:36 am  

What else was discussed?

Re: Q and A with Michael Carter tomorrow (Friday) : Sat Dec 24, 2022 8:21 am  

I sincerely hope Murphy stays, but lets get one thing clear, I would much rather see a good team effort than a star winger having to pull us out of the mire time after time. Wingers like Murphy and Johnstone are great to watch and have both (the former many times more) been matchwinners but we shouldn't have to rely on their efforts to constantly win games for us.
The Kershaws of this world will do that with the right centre service, and good team effort.
If he stays great nobody more pleased than me - if not we move on as we always do.