Revision to the gantry position. Less imposing on the houses behind, steeper incline of the roof. Also the roof of the original section is proposed to be redone. Still not sure how permanent this solution is but I guess with the objections it may be harder to get anything other than this passed.
Revision to the gantry position. Less imposing on the houses behind, steeper incline of the roof. Also the roof of the original section is proposed to be redone. Still not sure how permanent this solution is but I guess with the objections it may be harder to get anything other than this passed.
This post contains an image, if you are the copyright owner and would like this image removed then please contact support@rlfans.com
Revision to the gantry position. Less imposing on the houses behind, steeper incline of the roof. Also the roof of the original section is proposed to be redone. Still not sure how permanent this solution is but I guess with the objections it may be harder to get anything other than this passed.
As I pointed out with the previous plans, it was impossible for the gantry to be accommodated in that design.
This is a far neater solution and will look better also.
Khlav Kalash wrote:
Revision to the gantry position. Less imposing on the houses behind, steeper incline of the roof. Also the roof of the original section is proposed to be redone. Still not sure how permanent this solution is but I guess with the objections it may be harder to get anything other than this passed.
As I pointed out with the previous plans, it was impossible for the gantry to be accommodated in that design.
This is a far neater solution and will look better also.
This post contains an image, if you are the copyright owner and would like this image removed then please contact support@rlfans.com