Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 11:58 am  

What a powerful runner he is, nobody on here has, I think, ever criticized him for not running in hard enough, not looking for work etc. Any negative comments have been about his passing ability when playing in the Centre. Many have said that Centre is just not his position as he seems unsure when to pass to his winger. What no one can doubt is that he is a real handful on the wing, we now have four great wingers, I would say that we have the best wingers in the League. I think that the coaches have a nightmare on their hands when all are fit. That said with all the knocks , bumps and bruises I think Bill could do a great job for us in the second row

Re: Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 4:19 pm  

His third try on Sunday was a beauty. General opinion always was that he's a winger, not a centre.

Re: Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 4:22 pm  

Did he play on the wing against Wigan ?

Re: Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 4:28 pm  

FIL wrote:

Did he play on the wing against Wigan ?

Yes outside Reece

Re: Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 4:32 pm  

Okay, thanks... I was busy working on Monday, and although I saw the result, I didn't realise he had played on the wing

Re: Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 4:37 pm  

Redscat wrote:

His third try on Sunday was a beauty. General opinion always was that he's a winger, not a centre.

Notice that Tom Davis the Wigan winger who was reported to the MRP for his lunge with his knees on Tupou when scoring his third try, has got off with worthy of a penalty and no further action to be taken.

Re: Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 4:44 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Notice that Tom Davis the Wigan winger who was reported to the MRP for his lunge with his knees on Tupou when scoring his third try, has got off with worthy of a penalty and no further action to be taken.

If that was the one as Bill scored then there was no penalty. it would have been an 8 point score chance.

Re: Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 6:38 pm  

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote: If that was the one as Bill scored then there was no penalty. it would have been an 8 point score chance. http://www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote: If that was the one as Bill scored then there was no penalty. it would have been an 8 point score chance. http://www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary

Re: Bill Tupou : Wed May 31, 2017 8:42 pm  

chissitt wrote:

http://www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary

Well we didn't get one..

Re: Bill Tupou : Thu Jun 01, 2017 8:20 am  

chissitt wrote:

http://www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary

I noted with happiness our lack of players cited