Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:03 pm  

MATCH REVIEW PANEL MINUTES 04/03/2019 - MATTERS CONSIDERED
Case Number:

ON/204/19
Name:
Kyle Wood






Club and shirt number:
Wakefield; 9
Match:

Leeds v Wakefield

Competition and Date:
Super League; 1st March 2019
Report received from:

Referee; On Report
Details of allegation:
Dangerous Contact in the 5th minute (Merrin)


Decision:
NFA

Details of Charge / Reason for NFA:
Player does not adopt grip to apply pressure to neck of opponent as opponent goes to ground. Other tacklers lock player into contact as player demonstrates reasonable efforts to allow opponents head through the tackle.E

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:07 pm  

Watching itblive it didn't look dangerous.

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Tue Mar 05, 2019 10:17 am  

That's the right decision - there was nothing in it.

It's a difficult one though - I can fully see why it's treated as dangerous contact, as it has the potential for really serious injury; but in an era when many players back into contact in an attempt to enable an offload, I'm not sure how a tackle is to be affected without the attacker ending up in that position?

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:15 pm  

bren2k wrote:

That's the right decision - there was nothing in it.

It's a difficult one though - I can fully see why it's treated as dangerous contact, as it has the potential for really serious injury; but in an era when many players back into contact in an attempt to enable an offload, I'm not sure how a tackle is to be affected without the attacker ending up in that position?

Perfect example where the on report system works.

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:52 pm  

Am I right in thinking the alleged complainant was Merrin. He milked the situation for all it was worth, he is nothing more than a cheating Harse hole and was trying to milk penalties throughout the game. What happened in the end when the ref refused to be conned sums the bloke up in my opinin.

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:29 pm  

Prince Buster wrote:

Am I right in thinking the alleged complainant was Merrin. He milked the situation for all it was worth, he is nothing more than a cheating Harse hole and was trying to milk penalties throughout the game. What happened in the end when the ref refused to be conned sums the bloke up in my opinin.

Yup, kind of warmed to Kendall with that one.

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:11 pm  

Prince Buster wrote:

Am I right in thinking the alleged complainant was Merrin. He milked the situation for all it was worth, he is nothing more than a cheating Harse hole and was trying to milk penalties throughout the game. What happened in the end when the ref refused to be conned sums the bloke up in my opinin.

Indeed, even though he got duped by Pauli a couple of times, he realised and pinged him towards the end.

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Wed Mar 06, 2019 3:21 pm  

TrinityIHC wrote:

Indeed, even though he got duped by Pauli a couple of times, he realised and pinged him towards the end.

One not twice. He missed the blatant strip on Fifita in the first ten minutes so that evened it out. Merrin was at it all night.

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:29 pm  

vastman wrote:

One not twice. He missed the blatant strip on Fifita in the first ten minutes so that evened it out. Merrin was at it all night.

With Pauli there was 2 reefs, one of which he was pinged for. There was also that where he won a penalty by running sideways over the prone Leeds tackler to win a pen.

Needs to cut that out, could easily have given away more pens like he did when he first arrived.

Agree re: Merrin. Right grub.

Re: Kyle Wood v Leeds NFA : Wed Mar 06, 2019 6:40 pm  

I wouldn't say Merrin is a grub ala Bird or Hock, but he is coming across as a crybaby.