: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:00 pm  

fozzieboy wrote:

Wan....................MOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

secand................MOOOOO!!!!!!!!

Turd.....................MOOOOO!!!!!!


PMSFL

How's your French?

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:03 pm  

t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:

How's your French?

Not as good as my German and Im just learning Italian at the mo'

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:03 pm  

fozzieboy wrote:

Not as good as my German and Im just learning Italian at the mo'

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:05 pm  

t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote: How's your French? http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=396926

t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote: How's your French? http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=396926

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:15 pm  

fozzieboy wrote:

Not as good as my German and Im just learning Italian at the mo'

Why am i struggling to believe that

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:17 pm  

fozzieboy wrote:

Not as good as my German and Im just learning Italian at the mo'

Shouldnt that Be MOOOOOOOOOOOOOment

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:29 pm  

Well having just watched the highlights i reckon he cost Quins that game and wigan should be 4 and 0 right now, shocking double movement and then the quins dissalowed try. Also looked like fattyseenher butted someone at the PTB just before the interception try if someone has it on Sky+ could you check that please?

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:35 pm  

Barry Clegg 2nd wrote:

Well having just watched the highlights i reckon he cost Quins that game and wigan should be 4 and 0 right now, shocking double movement and then the quins dissalowed try. Also looked like fattyseenher butted someone at the PTB just before the interception try if someone has it on Sky+ could you check that please?

Don't agree re the double movement. It was a double movement - he didn't see it and called it as he did see it - that's part of the game.

My issue would be with the Quins no-try decision. Since when do we not give a try even when there is no definitive proof that he didn't score it. There was not onw shot that showed air between hand and ball, even though control may have been an issue, as such it should have been a 'benefit' call.

This is exactly what people have been complaining about in these situations - the video ref LOOKING FOR A REASON NOT TO GIVE A TRY! It is wrong, it was wrong last night and yes, it may well have cost Quin's the game, or a share in it!

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:03 pm  

There was doubt over the double movement so it should have gone to the video, i dont like to see them go to the video all the time which is sometimes what happens but if there is doubt then it should be used, if you are not going to go to it when there is doubt then why bother at all.

Also there was a decision where Quins got one from the video where it was a knock on so i am told but i didnt see it as my little un was playing up at the time but from what i did see it looked ok, anyone confirm this one?

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:04 pm  

fozzieboy wrote:

Wan....................MOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

secand................MOOOOO!!!!!!!!

Turd.....................MOOOOO!!!!!!


PMSFL

are you still mooooooing