: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:48 am  

adam9641 wrote:

He nearly took Paul Whites head off.

We don't control what the ref does, we beat your fair and square. But when we played you away this year it was pure dirty tactics that won you the game

See ya on Sunday!!

Watch it again if you can initial contact is on the shoulder and the arm then bounces up its just that the initial contact is that hard.
So the homer ref giving you a never was penalty try which wins you the game means you beat us fair and square does it
Ive not missed a trip to your place in the last 2 years but this year im gunna be in the lovely sea town of Seahouses this year so ill have to give it a miss.

: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:54 am  

Roverswall wrote:

Watch it again if you can initial contact is on the shoulder and the arm then bounces up its just that the initial contact is that hard.
So the homer ref giving you a never was penalty try which wins you the game means you beat us fair and square does it

Give over, I hold no grudges but it was a blatant head high with intent and was rightly a sending off. You would have to be totally blinkered not to see that. I applaud the decision just wish Leeds, Wigan and Saints were treated as harshly - don't you.

Thaler gave a borderline in our favour, you win some you lose some and of course you would have been just as indignant had you got one? - erm no thought not just live with it.

Thought you beat us fair and square at your place, I don't agree with Adam on that one.

: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:10 pm  

vastman wrote:

Give over, I hold no grudges but it was a blatant head high with intent and was rightly a sending off. You would have to be totally blinkered not to see that. I applaud the decision just wish Leeds, Wigan and Saints were treated as harshly - don't you.

Thaler gave a borderline in our favour, you win some you lose some and of course you would have been just as indignant had you got one? - erm no thought not just live with it.

Thought you beat us fair and square at your place, I don't agree with Adam on that one.

Thye went out to take Drew out asap! Was so obvious. But if that's how they wanted to play then so be it.

Any way that is all in the past, bring Sunday on! I am sure the lads will be well up for it like any game.We can get the most points we have ever got before in a super league season so it's a big game and also need to go into the play offs with momentum

[PopTart]

: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:12 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

Watch it again if you can initial contact is on the shoulder and the arm then bounces up its just that the initial contact is that hard.
So the homer ref giving you a never was penalty try which wins you the game means you beat us fair and square does it
Ive not missed a trip to your place in the last 2 years but this year im gunna be in the lovely sea town of Seahouses this year so ill have to give it a miss.

To be honest, even from HKR point of view you would have to say it was ill discipline. It was high, whether you say head or not, if it ended at his head with that kind f power he is always going to risk being sent off. He did't need to take the risk when tackling a twig.
You were controlling the game up to that point so whether fair decision or not, he let your team down.

and Seahouses is really nice. You'll enjoy it there!

: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:13 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

Watch it again if you can initial contact is on the shoulder and the arm then bounces up its just that the initial contact is that hard.
So the homer ref giving you a never was penalty try which wins you the game means you beat us fair and square does it
Ive not missed a trip to your place in the last 2 years but this year im gunna be in the lovely sea town of Seahouses this year so ill have to give it a miss.

It's up to the ref to decide. I really don't think he gave us the penalty try because it was his home town team or anything. Evenly matched teams should be a good game. All the rest is history now!

Re: Hull KR : Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:34 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

How on earth do you come by that idea?
You have won 4 times in SL we have won 2.
Do you not remember the sending off for the high shot that was on the shoulder?, And don't get me started about Mr Thaler and the 'Penalty try'.

We've lost two thats not good enough

: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:53 pm  

vastman wrote:

Give over, I hold no grudges but it was a blatant head high with intent and was rightly a sending off. You would have to be totally blinkered not to see that. I applaud the decision just wish Leeds, Wigan and Saints were treated as harshly - don't you.

Thaler gave a borderline in our favour, you win some you lose some and of course you would have been just as indignant had you got one? - erm no thought not just live with it.

Thought you beat us fair and square at your place, I don't agree with Adam on that one.

Like say watch it again first contact was not on the head although its a agree to disagree obviously.
As for the penalty try can you explain how a penalty try can be borderline when the ball was miles off the floor with 2 players in attendence and the wakey player was not even favourite to get to it first?

Re: Hull KR : Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:53 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

We've lost two thats not good enough

: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:55 pm  

PopTart wrote:

To be honest, even from HKR point of view you would have to say it was ill discipline. It was high, whether you say head or not, if it ended at his head with that kind f power he is always going to risk being sent off. He did't need to take the risk when tackling a twig.
You were controlling the game up to that point so whether fair decision or not, he let your team down.

and Seahouses is really nice. You'll enjoy it there!

That was why I said 'its just that the initial contact is that hard.' im just saying that to the letter of the law its not a high shot becuse his first contact was not on the head he was a silly boy giving out a shot like that I agree with.
As for seahouses I've been before tbh.
Last year was fun with me being in a Hull KR jacket and Hull City beating Newcastle on our first saturday, I got some mucky looks I can tell you

: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:59 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

Like say watch it again first contact was not on the head although its a agree to disagree obviously.
As for the penalty try can you explain how a penalty try can be borderline when the ball was miles off the floor with 2 players in attendence and the wakey player was not even favourite to get to it first?

Your right, but (if memory serves me correctlly, if not I am more than willing to retract) the alternative decision was to send him off/bin him - there is no doubt at all that Obst was taken out. Every chance we would have scored more from this than the 4 (6) points we actually did get - so in another way, you where lucky.

Seem to remember playing you off the park in the 2nd half of the game the year before when your man was (rightly) sent off.