Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 12:14 pm  

I'd expect the stadium to be branded as Wakefield Trinity Wildcats and wouldn't want to see any compromise on that given that we've been involved from the off and would be the anchor tenants while Cas would be short term tenants.

As long as the Cas fans respected our new stadium I'd be happy enough for them to play games there.

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 12:19 pm  

Have I missed something? When did Wakefield have detailed planning permission passed? I thought NM was going through a Pulic Enquiry and therefore has no planning permission yet?
And I though GH has been given full planning permission? Aren't Cas now waiting for permission to be given to Opus to build on the WR site then funds will be available for building at GH?
Although neither stadium is guaranteed, I think the question is a bit of a presumption.

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 12:31 pm  

The country is in a financial mess and looks like it will be for some time to come - has to be right to share. Travel distance for people living in wakefield and castleford would be almost the same - probably easier route for cas fans . Ok the site would be in city of Wakefield - but hey it must be right on the border. And of course the place would be bouncing when it came to derby fixtures. Common sense says I !!!!!! Might i suggest a neutral light aubergine for the seat colour - not that it matters when you have an booty sitting on it - and by that i mean a bottom, not a type of person..

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 12:37 pm  

Crikey - my last sentence has been messed with. the word booty has been replaced. I used a word beginning with 'a' followed by an 'r' and then an 's' and finally an 'e' if anybody can't work it out!!!!!

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:09 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

Have I missed something? When did Wakefield have detailed planning permission passed? I thought NM was going through a Pulic Enquiry and therefore has no planning permission yet?
And I though GH has been given full planning permission? Aren't Cas now waiting for permission to be given to Opus to build on the WR site then funds will be available for building at GH?
Although neither stadium is guaranteed, I think the question is a bit of a presumption.

Didn't want this turning into a dick measuring contest, for reasons you have highlighted in your post.
So yes I suppose you have missed the point.

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:38 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

Didn't want this turning into a dick measuring contes

Then why have you totally made up this then?

kinleycat wrote:

GH isn't looking like happening

When well...it is as Nottinghamtiger pointed out.

As it is though, if they had to play in another stadium Cas would likely go to the Keepmoat.

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:43 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

Then why have you totally made up this then?

When well...it is as Nottinghamtiger pointed out.

As it is though, if they had to play in another stadium Cas would likely go to the Keepmoat.

GH is a long way off.

It depends on Opus obtaining PP for WR, which is far from straight forward.

As I am sure you know developers are looking at 3 sites in Cas for a supermarket, one of which is WR. What you may not be aware of is that it Opus who are investigating the 2 other sites.

If one of them comes off first, the WR development and GF are dead in the water!

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:46 pm  

dboy wrote:

GH is a long way off.

It depends on Opus obtaining PP for WR, which is far from straight forward.

As I am sure you know developers are looking at 3 sites in Cas for a supermarket, one of which is WR. What you may not be aware of is that it Opus who are investigating the 2 other sites.

If one of them comes off first, the WR development and GF are dead in the water!

Well considering most/all of the articles have said they will pass on the money once outline planning permission is given, which is a lot easier than you Wakefield fans like to make out it is.

Like I said though, even if they had to move out of Cas for a year or 2, it would be the Keepmoat in all likeliness.

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:54 pm  

Happily share, I'd rather Cas get 3,000 each week at Wakey's ground than 6,000 down the Lane, in any division.

Re: Would you be happy to share NM with cas? : Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:17 pm  

Share - no thanks, personally would hate to play out of the same stadium as them but it's not as if it would stop me supporting my team or stop going.