[PopTart]

Re: Colton Roche : Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:16 am  

There is no 'back' to go back to in Bulls case. He may have signed elsewhere though.

Re: Colton Roche : Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:57 am  

fun time frankie wrote:

Well yeah they'd only just signed him before administration

And your point is what exactly as according to the record he's never been a Bulls player - or do we have to confirm these things with you in future.

[PopTart]

Re: Colton Roche : Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:59 pm  

His point is that some thought he was going 'back to Bradford'; you questioned why as he had never played there; he clarified that the confusion is because he signed a contract even though he never played a game.

Seems clear to me

Re: Colton Roche : Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:49 pm  

Yea apparently according to a thread on the Bulls board a bit ago, he was signed by them just before they went into admin , so it was never announced but trained with them. Not sure how long he trained with us but it didn't last right long.

Re: Colton Roche : Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:04 pm  

PopTart wrote:

His point is that some thought he was going 'back to Bradford'; you questioned why as he had never played there; he clarified that the confusion is because he signed a contract even though he never played a game.

Seems clear to me

well it would wouldn't it