Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 2:42 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

They don’t need to do anything because we voluntarily gave notice to leave.

Your right they did but still, it seems strange for the Trust to bring it up and say it in such fashion? also, The Trust says and I quote

The Trust considers in the light of the new Yorkcourt planning application and the development proposals for Belle Vue by 88M Group, that Wakefield Trinity will continue to play at Belle Vue under the terms of their existing lease until the new Community Stadium is built at Newmarket

So they might have information we don't & it seems plenty has happened since the notice was given in March time. With WMDC's perfect solution for all parties meeting as well as telling Yorkcourt to crack on give the land up. Then came the redevelopment proposal of Belle Vue. Then WMDC said it was building a Community Stadium without us, which was bizarre, to say the least. As who was going to anchor it and Newmaket is still on the cards.

Also, MC has been on here and said words to the effect, how can he sort anything out with 88m about the redevelopment or if we play at Belle Vue for next year, when the bloke wouldn't even take his calls a few week back. This is after 88m wanted the Cub to tell them where they stood.

Like I said though It all depends on the amount of rent 88m is wanting and whether it's even worth staying at present, even if a Stadium looked more than ever like it was going to happen, not that I'm saying it is. The amount of 400k was mentioned a few times last season that we'd paid. Even if it was less than that, to put it into context Wigan pay about 400k and Hull 350k a year for their Premier league stadiums.

Anyway, all that to one side HOPEFULLY Yorkcourt have finally been actively trying to attract businesses to Newmarket, seen as it's the best piece of retail estate around to my knowledge for warehousing and they just get on with it, with the obvious help of WMDC and provide what was promised for the Community 6/7 years ago and I'm talking about the whole sports facilities, not just a Stadium. Wouldn't you agree?

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 7:19 am  

The inability or lack of will from the WMDC to act upon this development would make our court case stronger.

Up the Trin

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 7:52 am  

I'm not buying this yet. I think I'd feel a lot happier if Yorkcourt were making a public announcement confirming their intention but as usual they are silent.
If they have good intentions why not say publicly what they are; I think they owe the public of Wakefield that at least, instead of hiding behind other people.

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:12 am  

Trinity1315 wrote:

I'm not buying this yet. I think I'd feel a lot happier if Yorkcourt were making a public announcement confirming their intention but as usual they are silent.
If they have good intentions why not say publicly what they are; I think they owe the public of Wakefield that at least, instead of hiding behind other people.

This news puts more pressure on the council/York Court to build community stadium and community facilities and if they don't strengthens our hand if legal proceedings were to happen that's how I see it.

Up the TRIN

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:16 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

They don’t need to do anything because we voluntarily gave notice to leave.

Did they! I wouldn't be sure about that if I were you.

What's said and what's done are two completely different things. If what the arm chair experts on here with only half the facts never seem to get and you are the worst.

I do hope that's not frightening you off the forum. Love Vasty x

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:20 am  

J30 M62 TRINITY wrote:

The inability or lack of will from the WMDC to act upon this development would make our court case stronger.

Up the Trin

Indeed it would - the further down the road this goes the stronger our case becomes. Especially when you remember Mr Box stated he would force Yorkcourt to accept a new Unilateral agreement not 6 weeks ago!

Can't really play the 'what can we do' card now can he.

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:03 am  

We activated the six month termination clause in the agreement. This is not unsubstantiated make believe like much that is posted on here but is indisputable fact.
What you are indicating is that the club were allegedly being economical with the truth and didn’t activate the termination clause.

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:23 am  

vastman wrote:

Indeed it would - the further down the road this goes the stronger our case becomes. Especially when you remember Mr Box stated he would force Yorkcourt to accept a new Unilateral agreement not 6 weeks ago!

Can't really play the 'what can we do' card now can he.

Exactly!

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:24 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

We activated the six month termination clause in the agreement. This is not unsubstantiated make believe like much that is posted on here but is indisputable fact.
What you are indicating is that the club were allegedly being economical with the truth and didn’t activate the termination clause.

Wow you don't say. And if they had and I can assure you I don't know, that would in this sea of double dealing in your eyes make them the bad boys. Trivial though it would be compared to the behaviour off others you'd love it as a stick to beat them with.

You see you've been rumbled. Every post you ever put is aimed at discrediting the club. The way you pounced on my little land mine perfectly illustrates your agenda and how manipulative you are.

Truth is I have no idea what's going on but I am at least satisfied in the knowledge that you don't either.

Oh and who the hell is this 'we' you keep referring to?

Re: Newmarket back on? : Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:07 am  

I just hope this isn't another case of Greeks bearing gifts.