Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 4:21 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

Well PT it looks like you were given duff info because Gaskell is one of the players named that is still several weeks away from recovery according to WP.

I bet you've just wet yourself ever so slightly. Does it matter, he wouldn't get selected anyway so maybe he's sparing his blushes

You're a bit tragic at times.

[PopTart]

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 4:21 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

Well PT it looks like you were given duff info because Gaskell is one of the players named that is still several weeks away from recovery according to WP.

Yawn

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 5:08 pm  

I don’t get any pleasure in the club wasting its limited resources on a player with Gaskell’s recent injury record. It was a gamble and currently it is not working. Why did WP inform PT he was fit to return when clearly he is not. We banked on his signing because as per Vastman’s judgment he is a superior player who can fill several positions sadly this is just a seat in the stand at the moment.
We have a record of wasting money on signings like Brough for example who we also gave a two year contract from Huddersfield despite his injuries and how did that go.
I am sorry if you don’t like the truth but 60 minutes play is not a great return. I agree injuries are part of the game but recovery times are very much based on the individual own body.

[PopTart]

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 5:43 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I don’t get any pleasure in the club wasting its limited resources on a player with Gaskell’s recent injury record. It was a gamble and currently it is not working. Why did WP inform PT he was fit to return when clearly he is not. We banked on his signing because as per Vastman’s judgment he is a superior player who can fill several positions sadly this is just a seat in the stand at the moment.
We have a record of wasting money on signings like Brough for example who we also gave a two year contract from Huddersfield despite his injuries and how did that go.
I am sorry if you don’t like the truth but 60 minutes play is not a great return. I agree injuries are part of the game but recovery times are very much based on the individual own body.

So, this thread is about the squad v Warrington. None of your points are to do with that.

If you are so desperate to score a point by all means take it.
My comment still stands. It was said at the time. Maybe he meant he was back to training but isn't ready yet. I wasn't trying to convince you of something.

Have you got any comments about the team playing this weekend or are you done now?

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 6:08 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I don’t get any pleasure in the club wasting its limited resources on a player with Gaskell’s recent injury record. It was a gamble and currently it is not working. Why did WP inform PT he was fit to return when clearly he is not. We banked on his signing because as per Vastman’s judgment he is a superior player who can fill several positions sadly this is just a seat in the stand at the moment.
We have a record of wasting money on signings like Brough for example who we also gave a two year contract from Huddersfield despite his injuries and how did that go.
I am sorry if you don’t like the truth but 60 minutes play is not a great return. I agree injuries are part of the game but recovery times are very much based on the individual own body.

Leave W P out of this nothing to do with him at all Gaskell was a CHESTER signing How you can blame W P for is Injury when the squad is far fitter than it as been for years I do not understand .Let's move on from Chesters signing and start enjoying the fresh attitude that is running through the club .Better rugby, more fitter, not to say the ground revamp .Let's get behind the club on Sunday and make a lot of noise so the Wires no they have been in a game win or lose

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 6:09 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I don’t get any pleasure in the club wasting its limited resources on a player with Gaskell’s recent injury record. It was a gamble and currently it is not working. Why did WP inform PT he was fit to return when clearly he is not. We banked on his signing because as per Vastman’s judgment he is a superior player who can fill several positions sadly this is just a seat in the stand at the moment.
We have a record of wasting money on signings like Brough for example who we also gave a two year contract from Huddersfield despite his injuries and how did that go.
I am sorry if you don’t like the truth but 60 minutes play is not a great return. I agree injuries are part of the game but recovery times are very much based on the individual own body.

Despite a couple of very serious injuries, and 2 seasons curtailed due to covid, has managed an average of 19 games per season for the last 8 seasons.

Still, don’t let that get in the way of a good moan……. Oh btw, he’s fit…..

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 6:56 pm  

I was beginning to worry I was losing my touch but no and the report came from a WP reported statement in the press, so I guess fake news.
I wasn’t having a go at WP I know he was a Chester special, what I was referring to was a statement by PT which said he had been told by WP that he was fit despite the above report. It would appear however that WP was misquoted and I expect WP will want to keep his match fitness by playing him in the reserves.

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:35 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I don’t get any pleasure in the club wasting its limited resources on a player with Gaskell’s recent injury record. It was a gamble and currently it is not working. Why did WP inform PT he was fit to return when clearly he is not. We banked on his signing because as per Vastman’s judgment he is a superior player who can fill several positions sadly this is just a seat in the stand at the moment.
We have a record of wasting money on signings like Brough for example who we also gave a two year contract from Huddersfield despite his injuries and how did that go.
I am sorry if you don’t like the truth but 60 minutes play is not a great return. I agree injuries are part of the game but recovery times are very much based on the individual own body.

The only pleasure you get from this club is having to sit under that leaking roof in the east stand when you manage to go, I like the we banked on his signing when it was clear that along with everything else to do with the club it's a big negative, I see you've managed to bring Broughy out of the woodwork, just how low do you go for your pleasure, you should find a hobby like politics, plenty to get your gnashers into there

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:43 pm  

chissitt wrote:

The only pleasure you get from this club is having to sit under that leaking roof in the east stand when you manage to go, I like the we banked on his signing when it was clear that along with everything else to do with the club it's a big negative, I see you've managed to bring Broughy out of the woodwork, just how low do you go for your pleasure, you should find a hobby like politics, plenty to get your gnashers into there

I can’t remember where this quote comes from but it sums him up.

‘ what makes you laugh, an open grave?’

Re: Squad for Warrington : Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:45 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I was beginning to worry I was losing my touch but no and the report came from a WP reported statement in the press, so I guess fake news.
I wasn’t having a go at WP I know he was a Chester special, what I was referring to was a statement by PT which said he had been told by WP that he was fit despite the above report. It would appear however that WP was misquoted and I expect WP will want to keep his match fitness by playing him in the reserves.

You’ve never had a touch to lose. Trust me on this it’s for your own benefit.