Re: IMG - Fandom : Mon Nov 20, 2023 5:25 pm  

PopTart wrote:

Exactly.
Same applies to Facebook.
On both platforms, just search Wakefield Trinity. Follow if you aren't already but just go down through the posts and like every post.

It's also important to like everything. If you look on Twitter, some posts have 250 likes, others have 20. We should be aiming for all posts to have the max possible.
And then comment if you feel like it as that's just extra hits every time.

Surely it sits with the club to make sure every tweet/post is worth liking/clicking? Some of the drivel they've put on there for the sake it over the years really makes you think what the strategy is.

Posting live updates on a women's game, a side getting beat very convincingly week in week out for fans who (mainly) follow to receive updates on the men's side, that were also performing very poorly on field just seems like a double negative to me?

Re: IMG - Fandom : Mon Nov 20, 2023 6:07 pm  

TimmySmith wrote:

Surely it sits with the club to make sure every tweet/post is worth liking/clicking? Some of the drivel they've put on there for the sake it over the years really makes you think what the strategy is.

Posting live updates on a women's game, a side getting beat very convincingly week in week out for fans who (mainly) follow to receive updates on the men's side, that were also performing very poorly on field just seems like a double negative to me?

I'm sure if you contact the club they'll tailor their social media output to suit your tastes

Re: IMG - Fandom : Mon Nov 20, 2023 6:24 pm  

AgbriggAmbler wrote:

I'm sure if you contact the club they'll tailor their social media output to suit your tastes

I actually agree with him. I'll interact with posts I find interesting, not to try and get our IMG score up. I won't coming home from work to sit clicking on links to increase interactions. I'm a rugby fan, if I was a fan of spreadsheets I'd stay at work and get paid for it.

[PopTart]

Re: IMG - Fandom : Mon Nov 20, 2023 7:10 pm  

TimmySmith wrote:

Surely it sits with the club to make sure every tweet/post is worth liking/clicking? Some of the drivel they've put on there for the sake it over the years really makes you think what the strategy is.

Posting live updates on a women's game, a side getting beat very convincingly week in week out for fans who (mainly) follow to receive updates on the men's side, that were also performing very poorly on field just seems like a double negative to me?

Why do you care. Just like it. Likes make points and points make prizes.

Re: IMG - Fandom : Mon Nov 20, 2023 7:17 pm  

imwakefieldtillidie wrote:

I actually agree with him. I'll interact with posts I find interesting, not to try and get our IMG score up. I won't coming home from work to sit clicking on links to increase interactions. I'm a rugby fan, if I was a fan of spreadsheets I'd stay at work and get paid for it.

Good for you, that's your perogative. The club, however, needs to engage with all of its followers, some of whom will be interested in more than just first team news. This is especially true if they are keen to expand their business model and appeal to a wider audience...for instance I'd be keen to see a tie-in with Wakefield AFC who are pulling in over 500 fans per game they're playing at BV.

Re: IMG - Fandom : Mon Nov 20, 2023 7:20 pm  

AgbriggAmbler wrote:

Good for you, that's your perogative. The club, however, needs to engage with all of its followers, some of whom will be interested in more than just first team news. This is especially true if they are keen to expand their business model and appeal to a wider audience...for instance I'd be keen to see a tie-in with Wakefield AFC who are pulling in over 500 fans per game they're playing at BV.

Wakefield AFC are doing pretty well on the pitch so the crowds may well improve further. Top of their League with only one club below with sufficient games in hand to overhaul them at present.

[PopTart]

Re: IMG - Fandom : Mon Nov 20, 2023 8:01 pm  

imwakefieldtillidie wrote:

I actually agree with him. I'll interact with posts I find interesting, not to try and get our IMG score up. I won't coming home from work to sit clicking on links to increase interactions. I'm a rugby fan, if I was a fan of spreadsheets I'd stay at work and get paid for it.

Your point is perfectly valid. That is exactly how it should work.
But it's a way for us to get an advantage for the club, so if I see a post from them, unless it's highly offensive (which is doubtful) I'm going to click like.
It takes seconds.

Re: IMG - Fandom : Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:26 pm  

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote: Wakefield AFC are doing pretty well on the pitch so the crowds may well improve further. Top of their League with only one club below with sufficient games in hand to overhaul them at present. They're playing some decent stuff too...I went along to see them play Nostell, the night the lights went out. The match and Stadium was reviewed by a YouTuber. https://youtu.be/owYiMokXWVM?si=DaEI8pZNVakJHvhq

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote: Wakefield AFC are doing pretty well on the pitch so the crowds may well improve further. Top of their League with only one club below with sufficient games in hand to overhaul them at present. They're playing some decent stuff too...I went along to see them play Nostell, the night the lights went out. The match and Stadium was reviewed by a YouTuber. https://youtu.be/owYiMokXWVM?si=DaEI8pZNVakJHvhq

[PopTart]

Re: IMG - Fandom : Tue Nov 21, 2023 11:58 am  

One thing JM said was that the football crowd spends more per personal the food and drink outlets than the rugby crowd. So an increased crowd will benefit us.

Re: IMG - Fandom : Wed Nov 22, 2023 8:39 pm  

Wow’s, that’s on another level https://t.co/tSoFfXmB75

Wow’s, that’s on another level https://t.co/tSoFfXmB75