PopTart wrote:
I don't disagree, but who should do it then?
Well before I start, Applegarth shouldn’t be there at all and he should have been replaced months ago!
Carter is and never was a good judge of players, you can’t tell him that though so we’ve ended up with him talking to agents and signing poor players on inflated salaries. We should have had an experienced man in charge of recruitment, call him a Director of Rugby if you want, but someone who has the knowledge, understanding to make highly informed decisions and stature to command respect from agents and players alike. That’s a universal and fundamental prerequisite IMO and we haven’t had that for around a decade.
Also, whatever’s holding up the change of ownership should have been sorted weeks ago, then we could have had the two previously mentioned issues sorted with the right people in place to sort next season out.
However, none of that happened and here we are!
What would I do in the situation were in right now?
The Coaching position needs advertising, let Applegarth apply if he wants but judge him against the other applicants.
I know that means we wouldn’t have a coach insitu and therefore no one to offer direction re player recruitment and retention.
It’s not beyond imagination that the current owners and the potential new owners could agree on and appoint a Director of Rugby who’s acceptable to both parties even before a take over gets completed. Then let that individual get on with the job of recruitment while leaving some room for squad changes once the Coach for next year is in place.
That’s a better route forward, is a more professional approach, would be more effective and is certainly more palatable to the fans than seeing Carter and Applegarth do it again.