[PopTart]

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 11:39 am  

Don Fox Fan 1 wrote:

I think he also had his mobile phone with him which is strictly banned on match days I these days of spread betting I can understand why that rule is imposed.by the clubs

But he wasn't playing.

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 11:57 am  

PopTart wrote:

But he wasn't playing.

Good point.

As I said, sounds like a way to get him off the cap. I reckon he's not making a fuss because he's been paid off - absolutely no proof of that by the way. But it does all seem a bit odd.

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 12:10 pm  

PopTart wrote:

But he wasn't playing.

Doesn't matter, it's against the rules as was the vaping. I've a feeling it probably wasn't a first offence hence the sacking and his lack of appeal but there's no proof of that either. When it's announced he has a clean slate here, over to him to prove himself to a new employer, set of teammates and supporters.

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 12:40 pm  

Sacred Cow wrote:

Doesn't matter, it's against the rules as was the vaping. I've a feeling it probably wasn't a first offence hence the sacking and his lack of appeal but there's no proof of that either. When it's announced he has a clean slate here, over to him to prove himself to a new employer, set of teammates and supporters.

It's against the Stadium rules, do the Titans own the stadium? I'm not saying you're wrong but sounds very dodgy to me.

Put it this way, I don't know who the Titans MVP is but I have a funny feeling he wouldn't have been sacked for the same offence.

I reckon if we could ditch Lineham for breaking wind we would, but probably not Murphy

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 1:32 pm  

Maybe more to this as even though he wasn’t playing that day
The possession of a mobile on a match day may be more sinister due to him having access to insider information The smoking in the toilet being the less staining accusation

[PopTart]

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:16 pm  

And he could have been trying to set off a bomb
Or watching Golden Girls reruns on the sly.

Don't start rumours with no basis please.

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:46 pm  

PopTart wrote:

And he could have been trying to set off a bomb
Or watching Golden Girls reruns on the sly.

Don't start rumours with no basis please.

You've just compounded those rumours with a couple of your own, wouldn't it be simpler to call it conjecture

[PopTart]

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:57 pm  

chissitt wrote:

You've just compounded those rumours with a couple of your own, wouldn't it be simpler to call it conjecture

Its not conjecture. Its wrong. I was trying to make a point about who ridiculous it was. Clearly flew by.
II will just take them all away when I get chance instead.

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 3:13 pm  

vastman wrote:

It's against the Stadium rules, do the Titans own the stadium? I'm not saying you're wrong but sounds very dodgy to me.

Put it this way, I don't know who the Titans MVP is but I have a funny feeling he wouldn't have been sacked for the same offence.

I reckon if we could ditch Lineham for breaking wind we would, but probably not Murphy

The Titans appeared to have a few expensive players who just weren't busting a gut or performing, Proctor being one. It sounds like a cultural issue there and maybe he needed a clean slate too.

Re: Kevin proctor : Fri Oct 28, 2022 3:28 pm  

PopTart wrote:

But he wasn't playing.

And neither was my beloved Timmy Smith when he crashed a car into someones drive at silly o'clock but he still did something that he shouldn't have done. Yes one is the extreme and one seems very silly but rules are rules, regardless of who sets them.