Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:51 pm
wotsupcas wrote:
ok then . FACT - WE WON 7 GAMES ON BOUNCE WITH ELLIS/WOOD COMBO
FACT - AGAR ONLY PLAYED HIM BECAUSE HE HAD TO - THEN GOT RID ASAP
I HAVEN`T READ ANYWHERE ON HERE ANYONE SAYING THAT ELLIS IS/WAS WORLD CLASS . JUST THAT IN THE ROLE HE PLAYED WAS A DAMN SIGHT BETTER THAN AITON .
FACT - AGAR ONLY PLAYED HIM BECAUSE HE HAD TO - THEN GOT RID ASAP
I HAVEN`T READ ANYWHERE ON HERE ANYONE SAYING THAT ELLIS IS/WAS WORLD CLASS . JUST THAT IN THE ROLE HE PLAYED WAS A DAMN SIGHT BETTER THAN AITON .
Only one of those is a fact, and not one that proves any particular point; Ellis did *not* singlehandedly win those games - he played his part.
Here's another fact - despite RA's ineptitude at failing to spot the talent of such a pivotal player, that same player now plies his trade on a part-time basis at Featherstone; two off-seasons have passed, and not one of the big-spending, talent-spotting clubs have picked him up. Go figure.
Criticise away - but don't pin your argument on Andy Ellis; it's just daft.