Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:08 am  

Why for goodness sake, the incident involving him and Germond will be reason he is going, final straw. it seems like he was given plenty of chances, club gone way beyond what most employers would have in the industry I work in. They stood by him when he went to rehab, they stood by him when he relapsed, they stood by him when he felt down and depressed and neede time off etc etc. It is not the club who should be putting out a bio about him, he should be shouting it out loud how fantastic the club have been in supporting him etc etc. We owe him nothing.

[PopTart]

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:13 am  

bellycouldtackle wrote:

Why for goodness sake, the incident involving him and Germond will be reason he is going, final straw. it seems like he was given plenty of chances, club gone way beyond what most employers would have in the industry I work in. They stood by him when he went to rehab, they stood by him when he relapsed, they stood by him when he felt down and depressed and neede time off etc etc. It is not the club who should be putting out a bio about him, he should be shouting it out loud how fantastic the club have been in supporting him etc etc. We owe him nothing.

I agree with all that. But I do think the point is correct about the announcement.
We don't have to laud him a legend but if we are going to announce it at all, it should be separate from Moore's announcement.

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:21 am  

jools wrote:

What a crap way to treat a former player.

Indeed.

Yours

Keith Mason.

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:24 am  

Khlav Kalash wrote:

Indeed.

Yours

Keith Mason.

Zing!

Although I'm sure 200 grand of Uncle Ken's millions helped to ease the pain.

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:22 am  

PopTart wrote:

I agree with all that. But I do think the point is correct about the announcement.
We don't have to laud him a legend but if we are going to announce it at all, it should be separate from Moore's announcement.

Do you know for certain we didn't!!! More often than not press releases are usually edited or shortened. We probably sent two but it was easier for the press just to lump them together.

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:25 am  

Prince Buster wrote: Do you know for certain we didn't!!! More often than not press releases are usually edited or shortened. We probably sent two but it was easier for the press just to lump them together. I think that they are referring to the statement on the official club website: http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... ent-171016

Prince Buster wrote: Do you know for certain we didn't!!! More often than not press releases are usually edited or shortened. We probably sent two but it was easier for the press just to lump them together. I think that they are referring to the statement on the official club website: http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... ent-171016

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:57 am  

vastman wrote:

Another attempt to make an issue where there isn't one. The club supported Owen through his rehab and subsequent injuries what more do you want ffs. Truth is Owen is just an unlucky player and his time in the elite levels was just plain over, sad but it happens so the club announcement was spot on.

The club have been more than fair with Owen, I understand he has been 'looked after' quite considerably and has absolutely no cause to complain whatsoever - assuming what the lad himself is saying to the lads at Fryston is true of course.

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:12 pm  

London broncos hooker Cunningham good player and fast to replace Moore

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:14 pm  

Good shout. He did impress in the middle 8s.
Is he a British player?

Re: Scott Moore. : Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:24 pm  

Yes, he is Hull born.

Was at Hull FC before, so no stranger to Super League.

Don't really want Kyle Wood, but his name keeps coming back, but no, please no.

However, if we are losing Fifita, could we possibly look at the quota spot for a 9 rather than a prop