: Sun Jul 19, 2009 12:53 pm  

Shawy wrote:

1st things 1st... KC was a silly boy & should get a ban..
It wasn't a cheap shot cause he was lying on & KC was trying to get up & play the ball.. Maybe next time he won't lie on the King

cheap shot from the fat past is best boy

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:00 pm  

Shawy wrote:

1st things 1st... KC was a silly boy & should get a ban..
It wasn't a cheap shot cause he was lying on & KC was trying to get up & play the ball.. Maybe next time he won't lie on the King

The same Cunningham who employs the tactic of holding the tackler to try to kid the ref to give a penalty? I seem to remember him appealing for one towards the second half and the ref dismissing it.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:03 pm  

Shawy wrote:

1st things 1st... KC was a silly boy & should get a ban..
It wasn't a cheap shot cause he was lying on & KC was trying to get up & play the ball.. Maybe next time he won't lie on the King

it was a cheap shot mate seen by everyone in rl. the guy has shown himself up badly.imo cunningham doesn't need to do this rubbish. should get banned but won't

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:10 pm  

Shawy wrote:

1st things 1st... KC was a silly boy & should get a ban..
It wasn't a cheap shot cause he was lying on & KC was trying to get up & play the ball.. Maybe next time he won't lie on the King

Maybe next time he would have the balls to stand toe to toe, then again we all know he would not

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:12 pm  

Shawy wrote:

It wasn't a cheap shot cause he was lying on & KC was trying to get up & play the ball.. Maybe next time he won't lie on the King

To be fair to Stosic, it can't be easy getting off such a large mound of flab.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:33 pm  

Lost any respect I had for him after friday

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:40 pm  

And whats more, did them two clowns on sky not see it, they must have spent 5mins talking about JD's incident and none about an attack to a players face.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:53 pm  

bellycouldtackle wrote:

Nasty cheap shot by Cunningham, it was not two players standing toe to toe and slugging it out when you have a chance to defend yourself. This was a cheap shot that Stos could not see coming.

I think that the RL will cite Cunningham and he will get a ban. He deserves a ban.

That said we do not want Wigan beating Saints next week, would you prefer Cunningham to get away with it and help Saints win next week.

Sort of makes up for that blatent forearm on Wellens, doesn't it? Will that get a ban, because it certainly deserves one.

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:55 pm  

SBR wrote:

To be fair to Stosic, it can't be easy getting off such a large mound of flab.

Like trying to stand on a water bed

: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:58 pm  

MSH wrote:

Sort of makes up for that blatent forearm on Wellens, doesn't it? Will that get a ban, because it certainly deserves one.

Ganson looked at that detail and ruled the try as okay, and so I doubt the RFL can do much about it. Anyway, it wasn't leading with the forearm. It was pushing Wellens away with his forearm after coming to a stop. Huge difference.

Admit it, your boys don't like it up 'em. You can tell they felt beaten because they tried to settle for a draw with a minute and a half left on the clock, and at least a full set of six on our tryline.