Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:42 pm  

the only stumbling block is (not saying who told me )
Brough and Cooke will play no part in any swap as Cooke wants to team up with Brough again, so they will be playing in the same team again but is it them or us

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:49 am  

brough will not be going over there, FACT..hkr are skint and from a reliable source could struggle to make the season start !!! administration beckons ! then a lot of quality players will be away on a free..

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:53 am  

crowt123 wrote:

brough will not be going over there, FACT..hkr are skint and from a reliable source could struggle to make the season start !!! administration beckons ! then a lot of quality players will be away on a free..

heard on two sides to confirm that but would rather the season started now to shut these up

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:59 am  

The Express is full of rubbish of late, thats why will not send a letter in, as they will put one Trinity letter in and two against stadium in just to stir things and sell papers, they do not give to a about Trinity...

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:47 am  

Apart from seeing if your old school mates have ended up in court, or scribbling over the pointless Leeds United page, what pleasure does anyone get from reading it?

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:01 am  

This is an absolute disgrace Brough and cash for Cooke what a joke. Just shows what ambition the club have. I urge evryone to boycott the club till this mess is sorted out.

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:43 am  

J.T wrote:

This is an absolute disgrace Brough and cash for Cooke what a joke. Just shows what ambition the club have. I urge evryone to boycott the club till this mess is sorted out.

And what's that likely to acheive given that we know that the "journalist" has clearly made "great efforts" to ensure that the story is accurate.

DB + cash for Cooke is not something that the club will want. We do know that the club don't want to spend money on transfer fees, so the only way we'll be getting Cooke is if he is released by HKR - something that isn't beyond the realms of possibility given the level of losses at Craven Park.

If you want to boycott something, why not boycott the Wakefield Express?

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:53 am  

RDM wrote:

And what's that likely to acheive given that we know that the "journalist" has clearly made "great efforts" to ensure that the story is accurate.

DB + cash for Cooke is not something that the club will want. We do know that the club don't want to spend money on transfer fees, so the only way we'll be getting Cooke is if he is released by HKR - something that isn't beyond the realms of possibility given the level of losses at Craven Park.

If you want to boycott something, why not boycott the Wakefield Express?

I feel J.T. has been a little too dry for you.

[Wildthing]

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:02 am  

t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:

Apart from seeing if your old school mates have ended up in court, or scribbling over the pointless Leeds United page, what pleasure does anyone get from reading it?

Yep thats the only pleasure I get from it too!

Re: Brough and Cash for Cooke? : Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:13 am  

RDM wrote:

And what's that likely to acheive given that we know that the "journalist" has clearly made "great efforts" to ensure that the story is accurate.

DB + cash for Cooke is not something that the club will want. We do know that the club don't want to spend money on transfer fees, so the only way we'll be getting Cooke is if he is released by HKR - something that isn't beyond the realms of possibility given the level of losses at Craven Park.

If you want to boycott something, why not boycott the Wakefield Express?

Its clearly gone right over your head