Re: Newmarket update : Tue May 16, 2017 4:08 pm  

djcool wrote:

Backed by Robbie Hunter Paul, I hope it was a better job for Salford than he did for Bradford

and a better job than his dancing across the pitch during the Challenge cup ties!

Re: Newmarket update : Wed May 17, 2017 7:42 am  

PHe wrote:

and a better job than his dancing across the pitch during the Challenge cup ties!

Painful that isn't it - running across the pitch, getting in the way, babbling breathlessly about body language and psychology... very useful!

Re: Newmarket update : Wed May 17, 2017 7:45 am  

bren2k wrote:

Painful that isn't it - running across the pitch, getting in the way, babbling breathlessly about body language and psychology... very useful!

It was like he'd been wound up and then forced onto the pitch.

They ought to evict him for going on the pitch without permission, utterly pointless.

Re: Newmarket update : Wed May 17, 2017 1:50 pm  

[quote="djcool"]Backed by Robbie Hunter Paul, I hope it was a better job for Salford than he did for Bradford[/quot

I don't know how he gets these jobs, I can't remember him being a success any where.

Re: Newmarket update : Wed May 17, 2017 5:26 pm  

His contribution to the programme quality was nil. I felt embarrassed for him running around on the pitch when play was under way. He was on the pitch nearly as much as that Wigan water carrier the other week. Please BBC if you feel obliged to employ RH-P, then give him a job worthwhile.

Re: Newmarket update : Thu May 18, 2017 8:34 pm  

Interestingly enough a piece on Sheffield Eagles new stadium states they can not play at Belle Vue next season. Sounds like this is the end for the ground.

Re: Newmarket update : Thu May 18, 2017 9:15 pm  

Excellent if true, it should have been bulldozed years ago. The red herring that Yorkcourt and Box fed Rodney of getting a lick of paint for BV meant that Newmarket was put back years.

Re: Newmarket update : Fri May 19, 2017 8:46 am  

bellycouldtackle wrote:

Excellent if true, it should have been bulldozed years ago. The red herring that Yorkcourt and Box fed Rodney of getting a lick of paint for BV meant that Newmarket was put back years.

Totally agree !!!!!!!!

I also fear this tactic may be used again in the not too distant future. They still believe people are stupid enough to swallow this and by putting it back on the table again they could drag it on till we pack up altogether then then they will have to give us nothing.

Re: Newmarket update : Fri May 19, 2017 10:08 am  

Prince Buster wrote:

Totally agree !!!!!!!!

I also fear this tactic may be used again in the not too distant future. They still believe people are stupid enough to swallow this and by putting it back on the table again they could drag it on till we pack up altogether then then they will have to give us nothing.

Still prefer to stay at BV myself if it were possible. However your absolutely right in what you say as is Belly - it has to be NM as per the agreement - or if there is an alternative it better be available instantly or work on it starts instantly.

In other words cash up front.

Re: Newmarket update : Fri May 19, 2017 11:00 am  

vastman wrote:

Still prefer to stay at BV myself if it were possible. However your absolutely right in what you say as is Belly - it has to be NM as per the agreement - or if there is an alternative it better be available instantly or work on it starts instantly.

In other words cash up front.

Just checked the land registry website Group 88 paid £760K for Belle Vue. That is peanuts when you look at the profit Yorkcourt will make out of the planning gain at Newmarket and they were not even prepared to stump up that! Tells you all you need to know.

A revamped Belle Vue was always a massive red herring and we were gullible enough to swallow it. If anyone ever suggests it again they should be told where to shove it.