Re: D-DAY Monday! : Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:50 pm
Slugger McBatt wrote:
Looking at wholly objectively, as hard as it is, I can understand the RFL position. Our ground is not fit for purpose. Our own chairman agrees with that. We have been promising a new ground since we were promoted. The failure of each has never been our fault, and we know where the villains are in this ongoing piece, but the RFL should be able to say that we can't play somewhere that isn't fit to play in, and there might not be a viable ground elsewhere. How long are the RFL expected to wait?
There are villains in this. I don't believe the RFL is one.
There are villains in this. I don't believe the RFL is one.
Our current ground is not fit for purpose.
Cas' current ground is not fit for purpose.
We have no timescale for moving to a new ground
Cas have no timescale for moving to a new ground - rumour has it that a number of the retailers they were expecting have pulled out
Despite the fact that ours is in the public eye due to lack of progress, there is little difference at this moment in time between us and Cas. Until they start building they are in the same boat as us - so why is it only our place in SL that is at risk???