Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:22 pm  

Trinity18 wrote:

Is this sensitive data or can it be shared publicly?

The fact that we are £336k below cap has just been shared publicly.

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:25 pm  

LyndsayGill wrote:

The fact that we are £336k below cap has just been shared publicly.

That`s quite obviously not good enough as he now wants sight of the spreadsheet with all the salary figures on

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:36 pm  

To clarify my "streets ahead of the bottom 4" statement (not that I need to for rational people)

The bottom four sides have been inconsistent and haven't put a run of results together all season (except widnes who's record over the last few months has been as consistent as anyone's) and if anyone's going to be replaced in 9th by catalans, who are admittedly putting wins together, it's looking far more likely to be Leeds on current form.

Wakefield have been picking up wins with fair regularity, and realistically only need 1 win, or 2 at very most to be caught by the required 3 teams below them to displace them from the 8.

If wakey win 2/5 then all three teams below them will basically need to win 5/5 to drop them to 9th.

I'm not sounding like a Wakefield fan, that's just how it is when you look at the table

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:57 pm  

vastman wrote:

Why would it be, stop taking for the sake of it.

Oh the irony!!

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:02 pm  

Just for clarity, when I asked if it was sensitive data or could it be shared publicly. Would a breakdown of who cost what be sensitive... Being told we're 365k under budget yet informative it still leaves us in the dark, hence why I was asking if it was available. I can imagine it would be very eye opening.

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:09 pm  

Trinity18 wrote:

Just for clarity, when I asked if it was sensitive data or could it be shared publicly. Would a breakdown of who cost what be sensitive... Being told we're 365k under budget yet informative it still leaves us in the dark, hence why I was asking if it was available. I can imagine it would be very eye opening.

I'm sure it would be eye opening to say the least if say for instance TJ got to know BJB was on £50k a year more than him, oh and before you go off on one thinking that shouldn't be right, I'm only kidding

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:12 pm  

chissitt wrote:

I'm sure it would be eye opening to say the least if say for instance TJ got to know BJB was on £50k a year more than him, oh and before you go off on one thinking that shouldn't be right, I'm only kidding

Wages aren't sensitive in football, you can pull the salary of pretty much any player if you wanted to...

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:16 pm  

How would you feel if your salary was given out to a load of strangers on the internet.

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:17 pm  

Willzay wrote:

How would you feel if your salary was given out to a load of strangers on the internet.

I couldn't care less, I think I've mentioned numerous times that I'm on benefits... work it out.

Re: 1 down : Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:18 pm  

Trinity18 wrote:

I couldn't care less, I think I've mentioned numerous times that I'm on benefits... work it out.

But I do see your point Willzay, some people might be bothered.