Re: Note : Sun Oct 07, 2018 6:04 pm  

TrinTrin wrote:

Yes, I meant it to be placed at point of request & it is a power to the council,sorry for any confusion on my part, I made it look like after building when I was merely stating the leader's comments after the furore & that cllr Box could have judged the situation & used the powers open to them by using a stop notice at the correct time which I did not make clear, but I am always willing to concede points unlike our council.
With regard to discussing points away from the attention of our supporters then no, there has been far too much schh - were doing something, don't tell them, our supporters & public. I can agree that some times information needs to be retained, if sensitive but not all the time which has helped to mislead people as our two so called partners have done.
With these two, I consider that if you have truth & integrity + openness , public supporters are not left frustrated, better not to take part in their type of behaviour. They can however start again & be open, this would start to create faith & confidence, but it's a lot to pull back now.

Not wanting to discuss matters that we would keep from supporters in the fullness of time but you are giving the impression that you are a professional and knowledgeable in the matter to hand and I just thought you may be able to assist the Trust.

When you are likely to be in a court of law you do not show the opposition what you have in your hand.

Re: Note : Sun Oct 07, 2018 6:07 pm  

Upanunder wrote:

There's a good reason our opposition don't release details relating to their past, current or future intentions.
Place your trust in the people we have fighting our corner and don't ask for stupid concessions on an open public forum that could prejudice our position, just because you wanna know what's going on.
I would imagine everything that can be disclosed safely, has been, and they wouldn't be very good at their job if they came here leaking info and giving the opposition free ammunition.
Quite frankly.....never mind....3 days in the cooler

Totally agree.

Re: Note : Mon Oct 08, 2018 7:42 am  

Well, wait for the submit & share to the court, over to good full barristers then, it usually takes 12 to 18 months to a hearing but most cases resolve on the 11th hour or as they say on the court entrance steps.

Re: Note : Mon Oct 08, 2018 8:10 am  

TrinTrin wrote:

Well, wait for the submit & share to the court, over to good full barristers then, it usually takes 12 to 18 months to a hearing but most cases resolve on the 11th hour or as they say on the court entrance steps.

These are the words of a self appointed expert, so excuse me if I put you on ignore - thanks.

Re: Note : Mon Oct 08, 2018 5:55 pm  

No problem, I never said I was an expert, I have only tried to explain issues, I also have no problem in ever being wrong or proved wrong, I also like all other opinions, that's the healthy way to learn. I do think our forum has a wide range of opinions & certainly the best humour.
Up the Trin.