wrencat1873 wrote:
You always seem to be the voice of reason on here but, when you say that Agar questioned the players attitude.
Surely, part of Agars remit is to make sure that, when the players walk out on the field of play, they are ready in every facet of their game, with a game plan to follow.
Ok you cant legislate for individual errors (which were plenty) but he should have them ready to play hard RL ?
I take time and try to look at it from both sides.
In professional sport you as a player have the responsibility to get yourself prepared. However I agree that I like coaches who have the team ready to go out firing with an appropriate game plan. I think I've mentioned before I'm not sure how good/bad Agar is as I've not been coached under him. I also wouldn't have picked the same team or made the same decisions. But we'll never know if the decisions I would have chose would have been better than his as much as I'd like to think they would. That's why I still support Agar but as mentioned before will pull my hair out over things he does.
I was also critical of the players and disappointed in their performance against KR. I'm sure they were and if any were not its time to pack in playing. At Wakefield we shouldn't expect much but what we do expect is to wear the jersey with pride and give 100%. Giving 100% is a mental attribute. That's why when your falling short you need leaders on that pitch kicking your booty when you drop short. "Eh Tautai your better than that man, come on.. Next drive make us some yards, we need you come on". Etc etc
I can't remember which poster mentioned it was MC worst decision about giving Agar an additional 3year contract. It wasn't him it happened just before. That's not he doesn't support Agar, its just a factual point.