Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:21 pm  

TRB wrote:

I have been informed that there is no requirement for financial input from WT and that there is no requirement for BV to be part of any deal either.

NM is the basis of our new future - anyone who stands in the way of this is standing in the way of RL in Wakefield - no exclusions.

Well that is just as well, seen as WTWC do not have any money and do not own Belle Vue. Who ever has informed you of that, could not really have said anything else due to the circumstances unfolding.

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:25 pm  

There is nothing less endearing than trolls 'telling us so'. Mods - cant these people be sorted out? Haven't we got enough to deal with!

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:30 pm  

NM is the basis of our new future - anyone who stands in the way of this is standing in the way of RL in Wakefield - no exclusions


I do find that statement a bit over the top, the residents of the newmarket area have every right to complain about the development , although I dont think they have even looked properly at the plans.

I went with a mate to the trust meeting as an interested bystander and it seems you have a core of supporters that would walk over broken glass for trin and I applaud them, but as shown at your friendlies , the people of wakey do not seem to care .
I hope you get sorted and have even signed your newmarket forms but fear that the stadium is now the least of your problems.

Good luck from Methley

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:36 pm  

thetruth wrote:

NM is the basis of our new future - anyone who stands in the way of this is standing in the way of RL in Wakefield - no exclusions


I do find that statement a bit over the top, the residents of the newmarket area have every right to complain about the development , although I dont think they have even looked properly at the plans.

I went with a mate to the trust meeting as an interested bystander and it seems you have a core of supporters that would walk over broken glass for trin and I applaud them, but as shown at your friendlies , the people of wakey do not seem to care .
I hope you get sorted and have even signed your newmarket forms but fear that the stadium is now the least of your problems.

Good luck from Methley

Thank you for your kind wishes, but the attendances and general feeling isnt towards Trinity, its towards who runs it at the moment. I have many people say they are not going there again or spending any more money with them until the regime change occurs.

A new ground, a new board, a new hope for the future will see many changes.

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:44 pm  

rugbyball wrote:

Well that is just as well, seen as WTWC do not have any money and do not own Belle Vue. Who ever has informed you of that, could not really have said anything else due to the circumstances unfolding.

That is right Rugbyball... you just continue being a bitter keyboard warrior and running everything down to do with Wakefield and RL in Wakefield mate. You clearly DO wish to stand in the way, but your intentions have always been clear if your reasons for doing so where not initially known. What I find most sad about you is that you are not even a local objector on Newmarket, with whom I disagree but have some respect, you are just a bitter Featherstone Rovers fan who just wishes to see Wakefield fail out of some misguided feelings of local rivalry.

Now to answer what I assume you wished to be a rhetorical question. As it was not the club that the information came from I would expect they would say something else if this was not the case.

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:51 pm  

Herbert Splatt wrote:

There is nothing less endearing than trolls 'telling us so'. Mods - cant these people be sorted out? Haven't we got enough to deal with!

Agreed; marginally less endearing than people who appear to be 'in the know' winking at each other for a few posts, before saying "you have a PM."

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:53 pm  

thetruth wrote:

NM is the basis of our new future - anyone who stands in the way of this is standing in the way of RL in Wakefield - no exclusions


I do find that statement a bit over the top, the residents of the newmarket area have every right to complain about the development , although I dont think they have even looked properly at the plans.

I went with a mate to the trust meeting as an interested bystander and it seems you have a core of supporters that would walk over broken glass for trin and I applaud them, but as shown at your friendlies , the people of wakey do not seem to care .
I hope you get sorted and have even signed your newmarket forms but fear that the stadium is now the least of your problems.

Good luck from Methley

I don't think TRB was (and I certainly wasn't) denying the Newmarket Lane residents or any other objectors of their rights to object but neither do I think he is being over the top... those people are indeed standing in the way of RL in Wakefield in his and my opinion. However, I respect and defend their rights to do just that, as much as I do with my rights to support the development.

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:59 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Agreed; marginally less endearing than people who appear to be 'in the know' winking at each other for a few posts, before saying "you have a PM."

If that is aimed at myself and RDM then I don't see any winking, if not, please accept my apologies in advance.

For the record the person who informed RDM was not the same source. So no in-the-know secrets here, just maintaining peoples confidence when it is asked for.

Sorry, could not resist the wink!

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:03 pm  

thetruth wrote:

I went with a mate to the trust meeting as an interested bystander and it seems you have a core of supporters that would walk over broken glass for trin and I applaud them, but as shown at your friendlies , the people of wakey do not seem to care .

Attendances at friendlies mean nothing. I have no interest in paying to see a glorified training session.

bren2k wrote:

Agreed; marginally less endearing than people who appear to be 'in the know' winking at each other for a few posts, before saying "you have a PM."

Funny that many who thought they may have been 'in the know' were merely just getting scraps from the top table. Hopefully for some who have traded on that, future BoDs will keep those at arms reach rather than being all pally pally.

Re: The Problem With Newmarket : Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:19 pm  

t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:

Funny that many who thought they may have been 'in the know' were merely just getting scraps from the top table. Hopefully for some who have traded on that, future BoDs will keep those at arms reach rather than being all pally pally.

Hopefully, future BoDs will have a fans' representative on them, and will operate in a much more transparent way, so there'll be no need for the cloak and dagger stuff.