Re: Owen : Mon May 25, 2015 10:12 am
PHe wrote:
I'm glad you have reminded me of that 'bundle into touch'.
What is the job/jurisdiction of the 'in-goal' official, does his remit cover foul play in the in field area? The touch judge put his flag up for the player being in touch and then the referee went to the in goal official and then awarded a penalty against RO.
Also anyone have a better view of the kick off that was deemed to be straight in touch when the Widnes player caught it?
Our players were very unhappy with the decision.
Apparently MC was a little unhappy with the officials at the end of the game.
What is the job/jurisdiction of the 'in-goal' official, does his remit cover foul play in the in field area? The touch judge put his flag up for the player being in touch and then the referee went to the in goal official and then awarded a penalty against RO.
Also anyone have a better view of the kick off that was deemed to be straight in touch when the Widnes player caught it?
Our players were very unhappy with the decision.
Apparently MC was a little unhappy with the officials at the end of the game.
The bundle into touch was annoying because the touch judge was right there and didn't see a problem with it. They scored off the resulting set from the penalty as well.
The kick off one I thought he looked like he stepped back from the field of play and put his foot in touch but wasn't near enough to be sure.