Re: Jarrod Sammut : Mon May 25, 2015 5:19 pm  

Willzay wrote:

Really every time? Granted he is at fullback, but FFS he is not a fullback! When he is at stand off like Wire away we saw what he could do. He's better option than the current rudderless incumbent of the 6 shirt whose only here for 1 season and the buggering off to Aus.

Yep every time, you're clutching at straws. Irony is that had he played more often you'd be the first to bag hi - are you just contrary for fun?

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Mon May 25, 2015 5:22 pm  

captaincaveman wrote:

I have no idea why sammut does not get picked but it is certainly nothing to do with his performances.
Something behind the scenes has gone off ,that is for sure.

Seems to be a lot of that at the moment .

It's almost everything to do with them, he's been gash for us from day one - jeez of;k are desperate if this charlatan is our saviour.

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Mon May 25, 2015 7:43 pm  

vastman wrote:

No he has not - not one decent game i two years and if he's the answer then I give up.

I'd agree with everything you have had to say there fella. smith is our best option with godinet. sammut has done absolutely nothing since his arrival apart from whinge

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Mon May 25, 2015 8:20 pm  

Your opinion only o great one. Given that he has had so little play time this year I think your assessment is flawed. Stands back and waits for insults.

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 7:18 am  

60sCat wrote:

Your opinion only o great one. Given that he has had so little play time this year I think your assessment is flawed. Stands back and waits for insults.

No wish to insult you at all. I understand your desire for something positive but IMHO Sammut simply isn't it. If you can name one game in which he's played that he's shown anything like the form he showed at Crusaders and Bradford I may reconsider.

I firmly believe in the two games he played v Bradford last year he actually refused to participate - I've never seen such a wilful act in all my years - disgraceful IMHO.

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 7:28 am  

Bully_Boxer wrote:

So he isn't rated by Wakefield but he's a threat come the middle 8's if he joins Bradford? I'm not sure I get the logic and I'd have thought freeing up his wage completely would allow Wakefield to bring somebody in they might actually play.

Assuming you have been watching Bradford for a number of years, you will know that on a few occasions Sammut has ripped Wakefield apart (which is presumably why we signed him).
Certainly, allowing Bradford to sign him, just in time for the middle 8's would be a big mistake.
What we have to do, when our new coach is installed is draw a line under what went on under Agar and Webster and start again.
No super stars, no favourites, just those who can and want to paly under the new coach

The guy does have ability but hasn't wanted to play (quite literally at times), as Wakefield want him to, isn't going to be popular with the coaching staff.

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 7:29 am  

The thing is with T Smith, he needs the right partner at Stand Off. Did we not learn that in his first stint with us when a chance pairing with Sykes suddenly unlocked the best of Smith.

Not sure that Sammut is the right partner for Smith

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 8:00 am  

Nail on head Avenger Smith has to have the right half back partner and I don't think Sammut would be saying that cant be any worse than Miller.

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 8:16 am  

That's it then, swop Sammut for Sykes.

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 8:20 am  

PHe wrote:

That's it then, swop Sammut for Sykes.

Many a true word. . .

I don't think it's the answer but it would probably make us more functional than we currently are.