Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:
I will say again that the list represents the squad used last season regardless of if they were on loan or signed, they need to be replaced. What does it matter if they were on short term deals they are not here now and will need to be replaced.
You can say it as many times as you want it won't alter anything, you failed to mention Godinet in your list making that 18 players, you also failed not surprisingly to mention Annakin from your list of signings making 10 in all, subtract that from the 18 that have either left or not re-signed leaving 8 players, 5 of those 8 are off contract when this season runs out, so can we take your word for it that these 5 will not be offered new terms or is that just another presumption on your part.
Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:
We have lost a chunk of very experienced and one presumes expensive players so we should have a lot of salary available. I wait to see how we spend this on and who we sign considering we hope to be near the full cap this season.
Just out of curiosity how privvy are you to the financial dealings of the club, do you know who our new signings are, nah didn't think so on that basis how can you presume to know how expensive they are, or are you just guessing.
scarlet Pimpernell wrote:
I sadly lack your gullibility when it comes to Wakefield Trinity and am not happy to accept another season of mediocrity despite this being an improvement on what we endured.
Not sure why you should feel sad about my gullibility regarding Wakefield Trinity, I make no secret of my ignorance of the inside dealings of the club and don't presume anything, preferring to wait until announcements are made instead of spreading false rumours and making silly presumptions, and if I may be so bold as to make a suggestion, if your not happy with your lot at Belle Vue you could always go and watch Eastmoor, the problem there is if you did you'd have something to moan about