Re: D-DAY Monday! : Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:41 pm
DAVE@CAS1990 wrote:
MC has been asked the difference between cas and wakey on this respect and the answer is fairly straight forward.
Belle vue does not meet the number of criteria the rfl require to deem it "suitable" . Wheldon Lane does. For now, anyway.
Hence the other questions in your post become irrelevant.
I'm pretty sure at some point soon castleford will be in the situation Wakefield are in, and will be demanded to evidence progression on the new ground. But as yet this isn't necessary.
I'm not making out Wheldon lane is anything other than a run-down old thing. And I certainly don't want to get into the monotonous "who's ground is worse" arguments....
But the answer to the above is fairly plain.
With regard to "D Day", I sincerely hope that the rfl interpret the council asking the developer to walk away as a positive. It could easily be misconstrued as a backward step.
Belle vue does not meet the number of criteria the rfl require to deem it "suitable" . Wheldon Lane does. For now, anyway.
Hence the other questions in your post become irrelevant.
I'm pretty sure at some point soon castleford will be in the situation Wakefield are in, and will be demanded to evidence progression on the new ground. But as yet this isn't necessary.
I'm not making out Wheldon lane is anything other than a run-down old thing. And I certainly don't want to get into the monotonous "who's ground is worse" arguments....
But the answer to the above is fairly plain.
With regard to "D Day", I sincerely hope that the rfl interpret the council asking the developer to walk away as a positive. It could easily be misconstrued as a backward step.
Yeah! see what you mean DAVE. I was there when your floodlights blew up!! Very safe eh?