[PopTart]

Re: Scott Grix : Sun Aug 13, 2017 8:33 am  

So I can't see any posts of those posts Vastman.
As Wildthing says, if you report it we can go straight to the issue.

As for you and Chissitt. Either PM or stop moaning at each other it's getting tired for the rest of us.

Re: Scott Grix : Sun Aug 13, 2017 10:57 am  

PopTart wrote:

So I can't see any posts of those posts Vastman.
As Wildthing says, if you report it we can go straight to the issue.

As for you and Chissitt. Either PM or stop moaning at each other it's getting tired for the rest of us.

I'ts just as tiring for me having to defend myself from this bitter obsession of his to try and score points and to tell lies about me at every opportunity, surely I have a right of reply.

[PopTart]

Re: Scott Grix : Sun Aug 13, 2017 11:28 am  

You can either use the 'Foe' button so you can't see any of his posts or report it and leave it to me.
I understand what you are saying and of course a quick 1-2 happens with everyone but it goes on a long time with you two.

I don't want to be referee. I'd rather just talk about Wakefield Trinity and rugby.

Re: Scott Grix : Sun Aug 13, 2017 11:37 am  

Just going back to max the lad has had patience of a saint in the 19 not played not in the 19 ,warm up prematch ,the frustration not playing must be driving him crackers

[PopTart]

Re: Scott Grix : Sun Aug 13, 2017 11:39 am  

It depends how Chester is handling it. As long as you know your chance is coming it probably isn't so bad.
If you are told you are just not good enough it would be hard to take.

Re: Scott Grix : Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:35 pm  

Brain noble when at Wigan dipped Sam Tompkins in and out for weeks , patience and timing is key

Re: Scott Grix : Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:15 pm  

Whatever rights and wrongs of the 2 players - our coaching team look likely to achieve our highest ever result in super league, working largely with a team of hand me downs, loanees or development players, a stunning victory against a full strength leeds team just reinforces my belief in kear and chester - so if they think Grix is first in the pecking order I am not going to argue.

Re: Scott Grix : Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:13 pm  

Can't understand why anyone would argue them kirmudgeonly, that's why they are paid pros and we bleat on forums how we know best in our crap jobs.

Re: Scott Grix : Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:04 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Frank baby, feel free to quote any post of mine where I have insulted anyone, you are right about a two tier system though, it's you against the world, poor old Frankie no mates being picked on again aw bless, here's a simple thought for you to try and digest, perhaps if you were not as intimidating and insulting in your opinion of other posters' opinions then surely by your own admission you would not have to defend yourself in such a robust manner, keep up the stalking.
I can't think why frank, I'd have thought you'd be mowed out with requests, the tellytubbies spring to mind

Chissa I owe you an apology.

Having read your last few posts I know realise I'm dealing with someone who has the mind of a child. Vastman (I'm talking in the third person here) is many things but he's not a bully.

Seek help dear boy, seek help

Re: Scott Grix : Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:31 pm  

chissitt wrote:

I'ts just as tiring for me having to defend myself from this bitter obsession of his to try and score points and to tell lies about me at every opportunity, surely I have a right of reply.

Jesus H Christ this is beyond the pale even for you.

So let's get this straight, you are entitled to defend yourself, but I'm not. When you antagonise me it's OK you're just defending yourself. When I do it I'm aggressive and offensive and I'm lying. I'd love to know what I've lied about I really would, on second thoughts don't bother because I do'nt care. I'm not bitter at all by the way, you leave me alone and I'll leave you alone, sadly I seriously doubt your ego could manage that. I could that's for sure,I find all this rather tedious

So as far as I can tell you really are one pompous old hypocrite - what this all boils down to is that like all bar room barristers you just can't stand people who won't agree with your every word - and if that statement of fact gets me reprimanded then so be it.

That's my final word on this matter as I'm sure most people will be glad to hear. Whatever Chissa says from now on he's arguing with himself.