I recommend everyone who's open minded and asking questions of the pandemic narrative to go to Youtube and watch The hidden agenda behind the planned destruction - Rosa Koire
I'm sure Miro has covered off some of these points throughout this thread.
The video helps to explain the driving factors behind the pandemic response and will bring about awareness of what certain groups want to achieve in the next 30 years at our expense. You might disagree with what she has to say, you might like the sound of the agenda, that's entirely on the individual. At this point in time though I believe it's good to be aware of what we think awaits us rather than acting ignorant to the opposing view. Time will tell us who's right and who's wrong.
What I would like explaining is why the district of the political entrepreneur Jenrick is not subject to any additional restrictions despite its figure being higher than some in the North that are. If you could also explain why no areas in London have not been made subject to additional restrictions.
Fascinating article by Celia Farber who actually interviewed PCR test inventor Kary Mullis.
A few Quotes. We’ve been hijacked by our technologies, but left illiterate about what they actually mean. In this case, I am in the rare position of having known, spent time with, and interviewed the inventor of the method used in the presently available Covid-19 tests, which is called PCR, (Polymerase Chain Reaction.) His name was Kary B. Mullis, and he was one of the warmest, funniest, most eclectic-minded people I ever met, in addition to being a staunch critic of HIV “science,” and an unlikely Nobel Laureate, i.e. a “genius.” Kary Mullis was a scientist. He never spoke like a globalist, and said once, memorably, when accused of making statements about HIV that could endanger lives: “I’m a scientist. I’m not a lifeguard.” That’s a very important line in the sand. Somebody who goes around claiming they are “saving lives,” is a very dangerous animal, and you should run in the opposite direction when you encounter them. Their weapon is fear, and their favorite word is “could.” They entrap you with a form of bio-debt, creating simulations of every imaginable thing that “could” happen, yet hasn’t. Bill Gates has been waiting a long time for a virus with this much, as he put it, “pandemic potential.” But Gates has a problem, and it’s called PCR.
Fascinating article by Celia Farber who actually interviewed PCR test inventor Kary Mullis.
A few Quotes. We’ve been hijacked by our technologies, but left illiterate about what they actually mean. In this case, I am in the rare position of having known, spent time with, and interviewed the inventor of the method used in the presently available Covid-19 tests, which is called PCR, (Polymerase Chain Reaction.) His name was Kary B. Mullis, and he was one of the warmest, funniest, most eclectic-minded people I ever met, in addition to being a staunch critic of HIV “science,” and an unlikely Nobel Laureate, i.e. a “genius.” Kary Mullis was a scientist. He never spoke like a globalist, and said once, memorably, when accused of making statements about HIV that could endanger lives: “I’m a scientist. I’m not a lifeguard.” That’s a very important line in the sand. Somebody who goes around claiming they are “saving lives,” is a very dangerous animal, and you should run in the opposite direction when you encounter them. Their weapon is fear, and their favorite word is “could.” They entrap you with a form of bio-debt, creating simulations of every imaginable thing that “could” happen, yet hasn’t. Bill Gates has been waiting a long time for a virus with this much, as he put it, “pandemic potential.” But Gates has a problem, and it’s called PCR.
Hope Mr Carter and players take note of this. By the way, good to see Chester devoid of a mask during the Saints game. Maybe he reads this thread
I don't have much time for the BBC but following on from the BBC's Emma Barrets amazing (amazing because it was on the BBC) interrogation of a government advisor (revealed in a previous post) we have this:
BBC Breakfast interviewed UK Dr Nighat Arif re the PCR test last Sunday.
She claims the Centre of Disease Control knew a long time ago the test can come back positive even when the virus is no longer alive. She continues, The Problem with healthcare professional who have had covid 19 and quarantined, is that they want to come back to work so we tested them again to make sure they were free of the virus but the tests keep coming back positive, 5 times a nurse was tested. That's the problem, they are testing positive but are no longer contagious. You are holed up but at no risk to anyone.
So Dr Arif is suggesting that though people will test positive they are of no risk to anyone. Does that include rugby players?
Is Dr Arif confirming what Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR is alleged to have claimed was the problem using PCR to test people?
PCR should never be used as a tool in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.” He is quoted as saying.
I would hope that when Trinity players go for their tests (assuming it is PCR) they are not afraid to ask questions or even refuse to a test that is, after all, next to useless. Only when those at the coal face (so to speak) begin to ask questions and act will we take back control of our lives, and our sport.
Remember 99.7% of us will not suffer any serious adverse effect from this so called covid-19. (statistics plus the words of the Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty.)
What I would like explaining is why the district of the political entrepreneur Jenrick is not subject to any additional restrictions despite its figure being higher than some in the North that are. If you could also explain why no areas in London have not been made subject to additional restrictions.
Probably the same reason rugby league was virtually outlawed by the establishment, to keep the oiks in their place.
Probably the same reason rugby league was virtually outlawed by the establishment, to keep the oiks in their place.
This is the only part of your potential conspiracies that may have legs. It's unbelievable that, the worst outbreak from earlier in the year (London) hasn't got the same issues as Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester and Birmingham, in term fs increased cases of the virus - maybe they just have regular flu down there
This is the only part of your potential conspiracies that may have legs. It's unbelievable that, the worst outbreak from earlier in the year (London) hasn't got the same issues as Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester and Birmingham, in term fs increased cases of the virus - maybe they just have regular flu down there