Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 10:40 am  

PopTart wrote:

Clearly not.....it would seem.

I did say "Maybe....."

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 10:41 am  

MOPSEY LIVES ON wrote:

Good grief PT, The club is rank from top to bottom, we've no money, we've tonnes of debt, we've our worst squad in.sl history , we've not won a game, the club is an embarrassment on the verge of relegation and some of you lot are still hanging on the messiahs every word and throwing yourselves at his feet. The 3 omigos don't care but every one is wrong, everyone is a liar and everyone makes stuff up. What a legacy he's created and is leaving us with, the quicker they go tje better

But, apart from that.......
......And it's "Amigo's"

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:15 am  

According to the examiner it’s in the closing stages of the deal , and all this hear say and nonsense about carter and Minards holding things up with demands is rubbish and heads of terms have been agreed ( whatever that means )

[PopTart]

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:29 am  

Heads of terms is effectively a requirements document from both sides.

Like they've both said what they want and what the require from other party, then the due diligence kinda proves whether each can back up what they say they can do.

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:33 am  

It's an agreement in principle, if nothing crops up in the due diligence period to affect the deal then it will go through as agreed.

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:49 am  

MOPSEY LIVES ON wrote:

Good grief PT, The club is rank from top to bottom, we've no money, we've tonnes of debt, we've our worst squad in.sl history , we've not won a game, the club is an embarrassment on the verge of relegation and some of you lot are still hanging on the messiahs every word and throwing yourselves at his feet. The 3 omigos don't care but every one is wrong, everyone is a liar and everyone makes stuff up. What a legacy he's created and is leaving us with, the quicker they go tje better

I’m not trying to be argumentative, but if all that you say above is accurate, why would anyone buy the club at this particular point in time?

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 12:16 pm  

steadygetyerboots-on wrote:

I’m not trying to be argumentative, but if all that you say above is accurate, why would anyone buy the club at this particular point in time?

Carter did albeit the squad is now worse, we will not be in the top flight but we do have the redeveloped stadium.

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 12:32 pm  

Interesting to hear that Carter had a couple of serious offers to sell the club .

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 12:44 pm  

Kettykat wrote:

Interesting to hear that Carter had a couple of serious offers to sell the club .

I'd be surprised if the guys who owned the football club didn't enquire.

Re: Matthew Ellis Takeover : Tue Jun 06, 2023 12:48 pm  

financialtimes wrote:

interesting to see MC's comment about the "malicious rumours" regarding ownership of the community stand, I wonder if he is considering liable action against any individuals that have actively spread those "malicious rumours" in writing across several social media platforms

Bring it on I say. He has my telephone number and email address, he can also get me on facebook messenger like his ex and current employees have done. I really couldn't care less, if he wants to sue me for my credit card bill, he can have it!!! Maybe he should concentrate on more important things - like getting rid of the rookie coach he appointed and getting this deal done quick so someone can sort the mess out he created.

Lets deal in some actual facts shall we.

1) I posted what I heard on 1 platform, not 'several' - Facebook. It gained traction on here by other posters bringing it up, and even 1 particular Mod (Poptart) repeatedly bringing it up.

2) I posted this on the 21st May 2023, he did one interview on the 24th May with 13rugby - why did he not address these so called malicious rumours then? Why wait until 3 weeks after they appeared on FB to now address them? Maybe the landscape changed and the prospective new owner told him to pull the other one when he tried to pull that trick on them.

For any further comments, contact my solicitor.