Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:13 pm  

Wakey Til I Die wrote:

Agar has admitted it was an experiment. Beggers belief.

More like excrement...

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:17 pm  

charlie63wildcat wrote:

Washbrook is shot. Has been for 18 months at least. It is tiem fo him to retire or lead a Championship side. Agar's persistence is yet another example of his frightening inability to see weaknesses in his side. Mr Carter, spare us any more of this, I beg you

This.

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:39 pm  

Surely anyone in their right mind wouldn't experiment against a team that you potentially could end up against in a relegation battle ?
Championship here we come

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:41 pm  

Wakey Til I Die wrote:

Agar has admitted it was an experiment. Beggers belief.

surely the time toe experiment is not in mid table battles but against top of the table teams where, dare I say it more formidable teams.

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:43 pm  

It was an experiment because they then had 2 left foot kickers to cause problems for their back 3 which he said they don't know if it worked because they never really had the opportunity to test them.

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:47 pm  

Agar has admitted it was an experimental selection and one that didn't work and resulted in a shocking performance, but what's done is done and let's put it down to experience and move on. Bad day at the office I hope and still think this team is better than last seasons if they keep focused.

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:50 pm  

But why do it today ? Baffling !

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:55 pm  

FickleFingerOfFate wrote:

Maybe the lack of motivation is down to the musical chairs in the starting line up?
Everybody was in agreement that when Washbrook went off against Catalans, we looked a better team, this carried on against London and to an extent against Saints.
Mathers not been particularly good this season so far but bagged 4 tries against London and had a reasonable game against Saints.
His confidence must be up, so to drop him at the wrong time, is another baffling decision.
Not to go over the same ground again but I think extending RA's contract by a further 2 years, when he still had twelve months left, is possibly the only poor decision MC has made.
Somebody posted on another thread that RA is like a cook with a lot of good ingredients but continues to produce omelettes.
Doing it here and did it at Hull with a bigger budget and better players.

This guy ripped the will to attend matches out of a lot of Hull supporters, like us or not, you were warned when he was set on and we were accused of being biased. Its not a told you so ,just everyone gets found out in the end.

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:56 pm  

M62 J30 TRINITY wrote:

Agar has admitted it was an experimental selection and one that didn't work and resulted in a shocking performance, but what's done is done and let's put it down to experience and move on. Bad day at the office I hope and still think this team is better than last seasons if they keep focused.

It OUGHT to be a better team. It is for me, on paper, which is where it will remain with Agar in charge. The players change, th patterns and performances do not. Common denominator: RA, his selections, his crazy interchange, his tactics, his favourites, the good players he has let go or not used. There is no focus. There was no focus whatsoever today, just a group of players who looked overawed and baffled. This has gone on too long and it will happen again. If it means letting some players go on loan to fund it, do it, but get rid of Agar ASAP

[PopTart]

Re: Agar Out Part 3 : Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:00 pm  

Because he wanted to improve what we had.
He usually gets criticism for picking the same old team and not changing it round.
We've had weeks of "get Mathers out".

It certainly didn't work but it proves you should be careful what you wish for.