Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 8:35 am  

les-goose wrote:

Nail on head Avenger Smith has to have the right half back partner and I don't think Sammut would be saying that cant be any worse than Miller.

If and its a big IF he's willing to play properly for us - shown no signs yet. If he did he'd be a massive bonus but I'm not convinced he ever will.

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 8:39 am  

I thought it would be common sense for any coach at a club like Wakefield that we need our best players on the pitch for the longest time they can be. Why Godinet spends half of it on the bench is ludicrous. He would compliment Smith at halfback as he would injext some pace and an ability to take the line on.

Another option would be to play Hall in the centre and move Lyne to the wing [where he would probably be better as he doesn't exactly feed his winger brilliantly] and drop Riley. [if you're of the opinion Riley hasn't been upto it]. Hall has definitely shown he can't do it at full back, that would allow us to have a look at him at centre and see how lyne and johnstone [our two quickest players] go on the wing.

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 9:12 am  

Adam_Harrison9 wrote:

I thought it would be common sense for any coach at a club like Wakefield that we need our best players on the pitch for the longest time they can be. Why Godinet spends half of it on the bench is ludicrous. He would compliment Smith at halfback as he would injext some pace and an ability to take the line on.

Another option would be to play Hall in the centre and move Lyne to the wing [where he would probably be better as he doesn't exactly feed his winger brilliantly] and drop Riley. [if you're of the opinion Riley hasn't been upto it]. Hall has definitely shown he can't do it at full back, that would allow us to have a look at him at centre and see how lyne and johnstone [our two quickest players] go on the wing.

Some good valid points made here and It would be difficult to argue with any of your post, but I'm sure somebody will

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 11:03 am  

chissitt wrote:

Some good valid points made here and It would be difficult to argue with any of your post, but I'm sure somebody will

No they won't!

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 1:08 pm  

The Avenger wrote:

No they won't!

(try scorer mode) Bold statement to make that, unless your vain enough to think you know what everybody is thinking.

[PopTart]

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 4:05 pm  

chissitt wrote:

(try scorer mode) Bold statement to make that, unless your vain enough to think you know what everybody is thinking.

I was wondering, possibly, that maybe he was being ironic?

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 5:21 pm  

PopTart wrote:

I was wondering, possibly, that maybe he was being ironic?

I was and he knew it!

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 6:16 pm  

The Avenger wrote:

I was and he knew it!

Sorry, couldn't resist, no offence mean't

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Tue May 26, 2015 6:46 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Sorry, couldn't resist, no offence mean't

None taken Chissitt, I knew where you were coming from, although it was a bit mild to be never scored a try

Re: Jarrod Sammut : Thu May 28, 2015 9:27 pm  

Read into it what you will but today I noticed that summits Twitter bio States only that he TRAINS with wakefield wildcats when it used to state PLAY FOR.

This to me suggests one of two things:1. He's making a subtle statement to the club about his lack of game time.
2. Due to whatever reason sammut will no longer play for the club and see out his contract by training only. If it is the latter he must have agreed this with the club