Re: Danny K : Sat Jun 16, 2018 6:56 pm  

A bully Vastman? So your on smack as well as arrogant. The arrogant comment doesn't come from this one post it comes from a lot more.

Re: Danny K : Sat Jun 16, 2018 8:34 pm  

Don't see how Poptart being arrogant has anything to do with DK's new deal, but those who think he is should have a look at the majority of posters on the VT for comparison.

Re: Danny K : Sun Jun 17, 2018 7:43 am  

Trinity18 wrote:

Jesus just imagine if I’d of wrote either of those comments!

You’re both wrong by the way... He’s pretty fair and has an opinion like the rest of us. Stats would usually help support an opinion/point.

Re: Danny K : Sun Jun 17, 2018 10:31 am  

inside man wrote:

A bully Vastman? So your on smack as well as arrogant. The arrogant comment doesn't come from this one post it comes from a lot more.

You know the signs do you?

Re: Danny K : Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:34 am  

chissitt wrote:

You know the signs do you?

You're from Barnsley, you got any Spice?

Re: Danny K : Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:38 am  

JINJER wrote:

You're from Barnsley, you got any Spice?

Just waiting for the rocket to go off, hopefully before I come to the game.

Re: Danny K : Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:28 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Just waiting for the rocket to go off, hopefully before I come to the game.

seems to be common knowledge to all but the rozzers.

Re: Danny K : Sun Jun 17, 2018 4:26 pm  

Pauli signed for another year.

Re: Danny K : Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:29 am  

PopTart wrote:

I agree with what you say Bren but its only when people try to use them to draw complex conclusions.
If you use statistics to decide who the best player is, then it is open to interpretation and misunderstanding.
If you want to find out who the top tackler is, its a straight updact

No it's not - because the simplistic way that game stats are presented doesn't account for games played, minutes played per game, whether the player in question was the first man or third man in etc etc - there are far too many lurking variables to draw that kind of conclusion.

[PopTart]

Re: Danny K : Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:28 am  

bren2k wrote:

No it's not - because the simplistic way that game stats are presented doesn't account for games played, minutes played per game, whether the player in question was the first man or third man in etc etc - there are far too many lurking variables to draw that kind of conclusion.

I do agree with that actually. It depends on the criteria.
I don't necessarily agree that the 3rd man shouldn't be counted but who decides whether the tackler is significant?
I still think stats are valuable but they only tell part of the story.