Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:33 am  

Ok sam you've made your point, stop being childish and get back onto the leeds board. !!

[Wildthing]

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:34 am  

Sam Buca wrote:

By the time you've done that i'll probably be on a boat to Rotterdam.

You cant prove your point so accept it as a defeat.

Lovely. The dutch will be moist with anticipation of your arrival I'm sure.

Howzabout you prove to me you didn't. Save everyone else reading the borefests.

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:35 am  

Enough you two!

All I was asking for was either a sign of respect or humility - as we were the better side over 80 minutes.

Some of the reports have made the point that it wasn't all about Leeds' underperforming, rather a case of Wakefield being good enough to win!

I do note that one poster has linked to a comment made by BM suggesting that we shouldn't take away from Wakefields win and, in fairness, I do think there is an element of BM responding to the questions offered - which will strongly focus on the preparation for the WCC.

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:37 am  

mwildcats wrote:

Ok sam you've made your point, stop being childish and get back onto the leeds board. !!

So you've realised that they cant prove it then?

Excellent.

BM will have praised you. If not in the media, he will have done it in person.

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:39 am  

Sam Buca wrote:

So you've realised that they cant prove it then?

Excellent.

BM will have praised you. If not in the media, he will have done it in person.

Quit this arguing - or I will quit it for you - both of you!

[Wildthing]

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:39 am  

TRB wrote:

Enough you two!

He started it!!

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:48 am  

TRB wrote:

Quit this arguing - or I will quit it for you - both of you!

Feel free. Although i dont like being branded as a moaner or a bitchy person. Which is what has happened.

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:48 am  

I love forum politics. Particularly folk demanding proof for silly things and questioning each other's maturity levels All in the name of "banter"

Interesting point re. Sinfield being allowed, as captain, to communicate with the ref (a luxury he enjoys a little too much most weeks). Did Child not talk to him at all?

Even so, Sinfield, as captain, should realise his side were being penalised repeatedly for particular offences and go on to tell his team mates to cut it out (presuming they don't have the brains to stop giving these silly penalties away without being told by Kev). Adapt to the referee.

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:50 am  

Captain Library wrote:

I love forum politics. Particularly folk demanding proof for silly things and questioning each other's maturity levels All in the name of "banter"

Good init? Its almost like an unwritten law.

Re: Not a Word.... : Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:57 am  

maybe the Brian could consult the laws of the game instead of expecting the official to spell it out.