Re: Andy Ellis : Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:03 pm  

Is Paul Aiton a hooker?

Tackle machine - deffo

Quick and reliable ball distribution - ????

Maybe Wood is more effective 30 minutes into a game when Paul Aiton has softened them up, which is why RA is keeping Wood over Ellis.



Did Aiton and Ellis ever play together?????

Re: Andy Ellis : Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:05 pm  

So we get rid of Andy Ellis so a youngster can have more game time in Matty Wildie and people are upset? Aiton is a superb Hooker and Andy Ellis had a small impact on us when he came in the 7 game winning streak is not down to him its down to the team hitting the next level. Personally id rather have Aiton at Hooker with either Wood or Wildie off the bench.... I feel sorry for Rich he gets rid of a player so a youngster has more of a chance and most of you are upset probably the same people who would be upset if he didnt give the youngsters a pathway to the first team! the poor guy just cant win!

Re: Andy Ellis : Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:40 pm  

[quote="Wildcat-Rich"]So we get rid of Andy Ellis so a youngster can have more game time in Matty Wildie and people are upset? Aiton is a superb Hooker and Andy Ellis had a small impact on us when he came in the 7 game winning streak is not down to him its down to the team hitting the next level. Personally id rather have Aiton at Hooker with either Wood or Wildie off the bench.... I feel sorry for Rich he gets rid of a player so a youngster has more of a chance and most of you are upset probably the same people who would be upset if he didnt give the youngsters a pathway to the first team! the poor guy just cant win![/quote)

. I think people are confused as to why we are letting Ellis go- the guys quality in different ways to Aiton, I think Ellis is a good old fashioned hooker, great passing from the PTB great go forward and solid in defence - aitons a tackling machine - his supply from dummy half isn't as good as Ellis and neither is his attacking flair from dummy half. If Ellis doesn't fit into agars plan for next season then so be it - I will back his decisions- however it still doesn't take away the fact hes top quality and has made an impact since coming into the side

Re: Andy Ellis : Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:05 am  

Very surprised we've let Ellis go, he's being great for us, i think he's an excellent hooker

I'm even more surprised he's not picked up a SL club?

Certainly seems like his face didnt fit but would defo like to wish andy all the best a fev

Re: Andy Ellis : Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:14 am  

If Wildie gets a chance next season then great, but when the second best hooker at the club struggled to get in the side then I don't see how Wildie will manage it, unless Wood is going to play more in the halves next year.

Re: Andy Ellis : Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:30 am  

Pat Bateman wrote:

No disrespect to Andy cos i think he has done a cracking job for us, but why has he gone to fev. Why hasnt any other Super League teams gone in for him.

Maybe he wants the opportunity to actually win trophies and medals, which, lets face it he wont at any lower end SL teams (no disrespect).

SL is proving that it is not the be all and end all, there is a very strong and competitive competition in the CC or cant you be bothered to check that out?

Welcome on board Andy I am looking forward to your creativity in our (already) outstanding "lower league, table topping (3 years on the bounce), Grand final appearing (3 years on the bounce)" team.

[PopTart]

Re: Andy Ellis : Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:06 am  

fevrover40 wrote:

Maybe he wants the opportunity to actually win trophies and medals, which, lets face it he wont at any lower end SL teams (no disrespect).

SL is proving that it is not the be all and end all, there is a very strong and competitive competition in the CC or cant you be bothered to check that out?

Welcome on board Andy I am looking forward to your creativity in our (already) outstanding "lower league, table topping (3 years on the bounce), Grand final appearing (3 years on the bounce)" team.

It's a fair point. Playing with an up and coming side that is winning things can be more enjoyable than playing at the big show. He is going to be helping develop players, he may actually be getting more money but he'll certaining get more game time which is important.
Personally I'd rather play a whole game with Fev than occassional half games with Trinity, but then I am older. When I was younger I would have made the opposite decision to see how far I could go.
Maybe Ellis is looking at it the same way. He's only 27 but we all view life differently.
Good luck to him.

Re: Andy Ellis : Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:24 am  

Wildcat-Rich wrote:

So we get rid of Andy Ellis so a youngster can have more game time in Matty Wildie and people are upset?

No.
People are upset that we're losing Ellis.
People are also upset that we might lose Wildie but keep Wood. Two seperate issues.

Add to this the possibility that we might get either of the two chubbies Murrell or McShane.

A series of backward steps.

[Frosties.]

Re: Andy Ellis : Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:25 am  

There was a rumour that you were in for Paul McShane.

Re: Andy Ellis : Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:37 am  

Would prefer Mcshane instead of Murrell.