Re: New Coach : Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:20 am
bren2k wrote:
I don't agree with the acceptance of mediocrity that Agar's appointment would represent - he's done nothing of note at Hull, with a massive playing budget, 18 billion loyal supporters and a wealthy, influential BoD behind him; what the hell do people think he would achieve here?
If, after coming back from the brink of extinction and conjuring up a SL future out of thin air, the best appointment we can make to lead the club forward in a new state of the art stadium is Richard bloody Agar, then we may as well chuck it all in now.
If, after coming back from the brink of extinction and conjuring up a SL future out of thin air, the best appointment we can make to lead the club forward in a new state of the art stadium is Richard bloody Agar, then we may as well chuck it all in now.
That IMO has always been Hulls problem - to many Directors who fancy themselves as Rugby men. Not trying to sell Agar to you, he's certainly done nothing great. That said he is probably better than he was allowed to be with old stone face at the club. He also lacks an Aussie accent which in the eyes of some directors immediately means you are entitle to push him around in a way they wouldn't dare to with an Aussie.
You could argue that Agar must be stronger than that and fight his corner and he should but it's very difficult.
I have experienced at first hand the different attitude most clubs show to Aussies as compared to British players and Coaches and it's pathetic and it stinks. Aussie are lorded to high heavens and rarely argued with, they are treated as equals by the BOD. Their British counterparts are with a few exceptions treated with utter contempt - Ive seen it at first hand. Not so much at Wakey but I saw it big time at Fev and Sheffield in the Hetherington days.