Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:48 pm  

If a Wildcat (or any Tabby) hasn't a big fat M on it's forehead a merger will never happen!

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:48 pm  

ambernotyeller wrote:

The whole saga has Rodney Walker written all over it, the man has been pushing for a ground share for months. I wouldnt be surprised if the worm wasnt in favour of a merger too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The game in going to lose a hell of a lot of supporters from both teams depending on where the stadium is built, if it ever is.

I agree with the featherstone poster the championship is looking better than ever, a real sporting division without the obvious bias of the Superleague. You lot stay at Belle Vue and we will stay darnt lane, and let battle recommence in the championship, sticking two fingers up to Superleague at the same time.


The Superleague is killing the game and they can do it without our help

exbloodyactly!

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:49 pm  

ambernotyeller wrote:

The whole saga has Rodney Walker written all over it, the man has been pushing for a ground share for months. I wouldnt be surprised if the worm wasnt in favour of a merger too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The game in going to lose a hell of a lot of supporters from both teams depending on where the stadium is built, if it ever is.

I agree with the featherstone poster the championship is looking better than ever, a real sporting division without the obvious bias of the Superleague. You lot stay at Belle Vue and we will stay darnt lane, and let battle recommence in the championship, sticking two fingers up to Superleague at the same time.


The Superleague is killing the game and they can do it without our help

we are out of belle vue come what may

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:53 pm  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

If a Wildcat (or any Tabby) hasn't a big fat M on it's forehead a merger will never happen!

that cat looks like i feel!

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:06 pm  

Furry?

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:33 pm  

Fully wrote:

Furry?

now your starting to worry me!

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:47 pm  

There were 5 teams given a warning by the RFL re Stadia - they can only bring one team up from the NL, I think bringing two in at once would be pure folly. So by my reckoning, if us and Cas cannot agree on a groundshare, then at least one of us would still be in regardless of work progressing on the stadium.

They might as well tell all the teams with stadiums that are fit for the elite competition not to bother going through the application process - if teams that don't meet that requirement are first in line for the chop (regardless of how well they score on the rest of the application issues)

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:51 pm  

Tricky2309 wrote:

There were 5 teams given a warning by the RFL re Stadia - they can only bring one team up from the NL, I think bringing two in at once would be pure folly. So by my reckoning, if us and Cas cannot agree on a groundshare, then at least one of us would still be in regardless of work progressing on the stadium.

They might as well tell all the teams with stadiums that are fit for the elite competition not to bother going through the application process - if teams that don't meet that requirement are first in line for the chop (regardless of how well they score on the rest of the application issues)

eh?????????????? dont you mean not in line for the chop?

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:53 pm  

What a way to run a sporting competition, it doesnt matter how good the team is, if the ladies toilets dont have soft paper then your out on your pimply arses.

And some people think Superleague is worth bankrupting their club for

you really couldnt make this fiasco up

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:54 pm  

snowie wrote:

we are out of belle vue come what may

Use the 2 million from the councils land to buy it back, that will really mess with their heads