Sacred Cow wrote:
They were, but only for about 6 or 7 weeks then back to BV to save a few quid. That wasn't long enough when trying to establish it in winter, then we thought playing 5 games on it in a month was a good idea. I can promise you our groundsman was not a happy bunny. The club have done very well with ground redevelopment but they do get things wrong sometimes you know and this is one of those times. We'll just have to deal with it.
We have dealt with it. The pitch has passed 2 x inspections. One in pre season when friendlies were played and 1 before Hudds match.
The pitch has passed the standard and satisfied regulations so I’m not quite sure how the club can be held to task.
If a pitch passes an inspection it’s fit to play on which they did.
I still don’t understand how a hull kr official can still say they have concerns when it’s been passed a few weeks ago and there was no issues from both wakey and Hudds.
I would be saying well it’s tough. You come and play on it or forfeit your game and thanks for the two points.
How can a pitch inspection take place and a decision be made hours later? Seems very bizzarre.