Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:44 pm  

Fully wrote:

No, but the point is, GH could probably get started and half-built with or without you involved. I'm merely questioning whether you moving to GH for a year whilst the planning issues at Newmarket are resolved (if the RFL would allow that) would you take it?

Put it this way, I'm sure neither club - even if we're going into a groundshare - would EVER give up on their dream of their own stadium. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if plans were continued onwards for the next three years.

You're obsessed old son! Are you responding to every post on this subject on the Cas board too, or are you here as a special envoy, just to keep us Wakey fans in the picture about what's best for us?

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:44 pm  

Schunter wrote:

Simple question, then why haven't you?

Perhaps the lack of full planning permission?

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:46 pm  

Fully wrote:

Perhaps the lack of full planning permission?

or money

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:47 pm  

wildcat13 wrote:

cos cas know without wakey they r getting zilch

And with wakey we would be getting an IVA or even bankruptcy,
do you see anyone can talk sheeite, but you have it down to a fine art

fact... Cas dont want your lot

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:48 pm  

bren2k wrote:

You're obsessed old son! Are you responding to every post on this subject on the Cas board too, or are you here as a special envoy, just to keep us Wakey fans in the picture about what's best for us?

The Wakey board is where the primary discussion is (probably because there are more Wakey fans than Cas fans on RLFans).

I'm merely looking at all options - put it this way, whatever happens is out of our hands now.

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:50 pm  

Fully wrote:

The Wakey board is where the primary discussion is (probably because there are more Wakey fans than Cas fans on RLFans).

I'm merely looking at all options - put it this way, whatever happens is out of our hands now.

That's because it's difficult to type with webbed fingers, plus the single central eye is not a help, or indeed the fact that their mostly iliterate bufoons!!!

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:55 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

That's because it's difficult to type with webbed fingers, plus the single central eye is not a help, or indeed the fact that their mostly iliterate bufoons!!!

The irony in that one sentence is fantastic.

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:56 pm  

[quote="ambernotyeller"]And with wakey we would be getting an IVA or even bankruptcy,
do you see anyone can talk sheeite, but you have it down to a fine art

fact... Cas dont want your lot[/quote ave it

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:57 pm  

Ouch!!

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:59 pm  

Fully wrote:

The Wakey board is where the primary discussion is (probably because there are more Wakey fans than Cas fans on RLFans).

I'm merely looking at all options - put it this way, whatever happens is out of our hands now.

Super - I admire your thoroughness and all, but really, we get your point now so you could easily shut the f*ck up without upsetting anyone. Just a thought.