Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:25 pm  

38 pages of reasonable debate, lets not drop down to childish remarks, it won't help anyone.

If posters from both sides can't debate at an adult level they won't debate at all.

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:28 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Feel free - keep hitting refresh until you get the audience you want; meanwhile, don't feel obliged to post a rebuttal to every Wakefield fan posting an opinion other than 'Sharing at GH is the best option.' The ill-disguised and premature gloating is getting very dull.

If you had read my posts instead of secong guessing , you would see i am totally against ground sharing and would prefer both clubs to achieve their new stadia or, i am in favour of both clubs telling superleagu to feck off and resume hostilities in whatever league the clowns at red hall decide to put us in. Obviously GH is the best option for me just as NM is for you, but in my opinion , whichever club moves away from its home base will wither and die. I do not want that to happen to any club nevermind our 2.

If you see that as gloating well so be it

One thing I can tell you, Wakefield are being shafted by more than counceller Box, Rodney Walker is the main culprit in this fiasco, the truth will out some day, I just hope its not too late for both clubs

Remember the game is called RUGBY LEAGUE, not superleague and life outside that twisted and bent league may not be too bad

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:33 pm  

ambernotyeller wrote:

If you had read my posts instead of secong guessing , you would see i am totally against ground sharing and would prefer both clubs to achieve their new stadia or, i am in favour of both clubs telling superleagu to feck off and resume hostilities in whatever league the clowns at red hall decide to put us in. Obviously GH is the best option for me just as NM is for you, but in my opinion , whichever club moves away from its home base will wither and die. I do not want that to happen to any club nevermind our 2.

If you see that as gloating well so be it

One thing I can tell you, Wakefield are being shafted by more than counceller Box, Rodney Walker is the main culprit in this fiasco, the truth will out some day, I just hope its not too late for both clubs

Remember the game is called RUGBY LEAGUE, not superleague and life outside that twisted and bent league may not be too bad

finally i agree with you also may the best team win tomorrow.hopefully wakey.

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:37 pm  

wildcat13 wrote:

finally i agree with you also may the best team win tomorrow.hopefully wakey.

make you mind up then do you want the best team to win or Wakey to win ??

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:41 pm  

ambernotyeller wrote:

make you mind up then do you want the best team to win or Wakey to win ??

like i said,the best team WAKEY.

Re: Stadium Statement : Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:11 pm  

no debate here for me

Newmarket... yes... for superleague
Belle Vue... yes... for any other form of existence

merge or die... die


glasshoughton... no
barnsley... no

Re: Stadium Statement : Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:50 am  

Fully wrote:

Well, on the other thread KK says that the club will not move to GH. Therefore, I'd like to see how the council react then?

I'll tell you how the council will react. You can read it here now, save yourself the anxious wait. The council will say that the feasibility study says that under present circumstances, Glasshoughton is the better option. The council will say "thanks", re-allocate the land asset to Cas to borrow against, and you will have your stadium. The rest I don't know, and I can't be bothered to contemplate.

Re: Stadium Statement : Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:09 am  

There's one thing that is known at this stage & that is that BV will not be home to Wakefield Trinity in 5 years time. I don't know whether we'll be playing at Newmarket, Oakwell, Glasshoughton or Timbuctoo, but Cala Homes won't wait forever for us to move out.

At least we know that whatever is decided over the next couple of months for our new home WILL happen because with or without a franchise beyond next season, we will be leaving BV in the not too distant future.

Re: Stadium Statement : Sun Jul 18, 2010 6:59 am  

RebelRebel wrote:

I'll tell you how the council will react. You can read it here now, save yourself the anxious wait. The council will say that the feasibility study says that under present circumstances, Glasshoughton is the better option. The council will say "thanks",re-allocate the land asset to Cas to borrow against, and you will have your stadium. The rest I don't know, and I can't be bothered to contemplate.

Without going into Detail about Mr Box, his agenda is plain enough for all to see, one ground share at GH if thats what you can call it. For me it would not be a ground share we would just be a cuckoo in their nest.

Re: Stadium Statement : Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:03 am  

RebelRebel wrote:

I'll tell you how the council will react. You can read it here now, save yourself the anxious wait. The council will say that the feasibility study says that under present circumstances, Glasshoughton is the better option. The council will say "thanks", re-allocate the land asset to Cas to borrow against, and you will have your stadium. The rest I don't know, and I can't be bothered to contemplate.

Well said; it's patently clear that Box has deliberately maneuvered us into this position because he knows that his own team can't make GH work without WTW's money. Therefore, the feasibility study will say exactly what he wants it to say and he'll spin it as WMDC acting tough with both organisations to get value for money for the people of Wakefield, whilst he high-fives Richard Wright and Co in the executive facilities at GH.

Pretending that this is anything other than a complete stitch-up is disingenuous and dishonest.