Re: Tick Tock : Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:47 am  

coco the fullback wrote:

The tick has been tocked

I think your profile pic sums it up nicely - that's exactly how I feel!

Re: Tick Tock : Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:59 am  

D-3.

Re: Tick Tock : Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:01 pm  

Khlav Kalash wrote:

D-3.

I should know this but what does D-3 mean

Re: Tick Tock : Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:03 pm  

At a guess days left?

Re: Tick Tock : Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:03 pm  

vastman wrote:

Khlav Kalash wrote:

D-3.

I should know this but what does D-3 mean

Countdown to Thursday! OP to be ratified (subject to the approval of the S106).

Re: Tick Tock : Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:06 pm  

vastman wrote:

I should know this but what does D-3 mean

The final sign-off from SoS for Newmarket. Final decision due to be issued on or before 13th September.

We can then, I think, get to see the final documentation & the signed section 106 agreement as well.

We also think we will get an e-mail (the parties to the inquiry) from the SoS office like last time, but can't be sure. As soon as anything lands I will post it up.

We are not expecting anything other than confirmation it is all sorted & planning is now formally granted.

Re: Tick Tock : Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:46 pm  

All sounds good, roll on thursday and maybe some news to boost the team for the weekend

Re: Tick Tock : Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:36 am  

Taken from our friends over the commons forum. Starting to believe Yorkcourt are playing for time for some reason. Any comments welcome. Back to the wakefield's stadium, the 106 agreement still has not been submitted. This should have been sorted back when Wakefield Council approved the planning before the PI, why are they getting so many deadlines extended?? Here's the proof: --- Dear Sir/Madam Further to Pamela Robert's letter of 20 June on the above, you will wish to know that the Secretary of State will not issue a decision on this case on the previously notified date of 13 September. This is because we have yet to receive a completed copy of a s106 planning obligation from the appellants. We are however assured by the appellants that a completed document will be sent to us very soon. We will allow further time for taking a final decision to allow for receipt of that document. We will issue a decision as soon as possible. Please accept our apologies for the delay in deciding this case. Michael Taylor Planning Casework Division Department for Communities and Local Government 1/H1, Eland House Bressenden Place London, SW1E 5DU Tel: 03034441631 --- This is contrary to what Mr Armadillo said to all his followers on the 16th August, so who's lying to the Wakefield fans? Yorkcourt or Armadillo??? --- Post subject: Re: Newmarket, what is the next step ?Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm Tricky2309 wrote:It was not submitted on time if the comments of one of the posters on cas forum is to be believed. Do TRB or IA have any comments? Well, whomever they are would be incorrect. We were told everything was going well last week but we just wanted to get final definitive confirmation before posting anything. We have just had confirmation, direct from Colin Mackie himself, that everything has gone in to the deadline and the SoS and his team are all working well together. So, now we wait again! viewtopic.php? ... 7&start=20 --- If a 106 agreement can't be agreed it will definitely be an interesting outcome to the planning!

Taken from our friends over the commons forum. Starting to believe Yorkcourt are playing for time for some reason. Any comments welcome. Back to the wakefield's stadium, the 106 agreement still has not been submitted. This should have been sorted back when Wakefield Council approved the planning before the PI, why are they getting so many deadlines extended?? Here's the proof: --- Dear Sir/Madam Further to Pamela Robert's letter of 20 June on the above, you will wish to know that the Secretary of State will not issue a decision on this case on the previously notified date of 13 September. This is because we have yet to receive a completed copy of a s106 planning obligation from the appellants. We are however assured by the appellants that a completed document will be sent to us very soon. We will allow further time for taking a final decision to allow for receipt of that document. We will issue a decision as soon as possible. Please accept our apologies for the delay in deciding this case. Michael Taylor Planning Casework Division Department for Communities and Local Government 1/H1, Eland House Bressenden Place London, SW1E 5DU Tel: 03034441631 --- This is contrary to what Mr Armadillo said to all his followers on the 16th August, so who's lying to the Wakefield fans? Yorkcourt or Armadillo??? --- Post subject: Re: Newmarket, what is the next step ?Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm Tricky2309 wrote:It was not submitted on time if the comments of one of the posters on cas forum is to be believed. Do TRB or IA have any comments? Well, whomever they are would be incorrect. We were told everything was going well last week but we just wanted to get final definitive confirmation before posting anything. We have just had confirmation, direct from Colin Mackie himself, that everything has gone in to the deadline and the SoS and his team are all working well together. So, now we wait again! viewtopic.php? ... 7&start=20 --- If a 106 agreement can't be agreed it will definitely be an interesting outcome to the planning!

Re: Tick Tock : Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:43 am  

#obsessed

Re: Tick Tock : Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:08 am  

bren2k wrote:

#obsessed

Question does have to be asked though, why haven't they yet submitted the S106 agreement? Whats the delay?