Re: Widnes : Fri May 25, 2018 8:35 am
Willzay wrote:
He might be labelled as both but again he's better at 9 so why move him from there and leave only one option at 9 (Randell)?
You claim he's better at 9 but that's your opinion, IMO we have a hooker who can play the full 80 (not saying I don't see an impact when a fresh Wood comes on in the second half) but we don't have a half back and I think Wood would have more of an impact at 7 than Hampshire would...
It's all hypothetical anyway, Jowitt will play FB with Hampshire at 7...