Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 6:35 am  

Who genuinely cares. I’m sick to death of coming on here to find every page derailed by constant c#ck measuring contests. Honestly I cringe reading it, men arguing abit owt and nowt.

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 6:35 am  

chissitt wrote: Not really, Amor signed for St Helens in September 2013 well before Carters time. I don't want to throw fuel on the fire but I think MC took over in August 2013..... https://www.sportspromedia.com/movers-and-shakers/carter_replaces_glover_as_wakefield_chair

chissitt wrote: Not really, Amor signed for St Helens in September 2013 well before Carters time. I don't want to throw fuel on the fire but I think MC took over in August 2013..... https://www.sportspromedia.com/movers-and-shakers/carter_replaces_glover_as_wakefield_chair

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 6:43 am  

supercat wrote:

Glover left in august 2013

Armor smith and cockayne all left after this in September

Again does it matter? Seriously?

Even if he didn’t have to get rid of those player for financial reasons letting two players go hardly makes us a ‘selling’ club. Also did we receive a fee for Cockayne?

Scarlett and to a degree yourself are missing the point and getting hung up on tiny details and they are tiny. Though Scarlet is simply doing it to create an argument to further an agenda.

The bald facts are that since roughly 2015 we have not sold or let go any player we wished to keep unless they wanted to leave ie Westerman. To me that is an absolute joy and contrasts totally to all my previous experiences with the club.

MC is a builder, he’s a builder with a cash flow problem but he steadfastly keeps laying those bricks, you have to admire that or at least I do.

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 6:46 am  

Pat Bateman wrote:

Who genuinely cares. I’m sick to death of coming on here to find every page derailed by constant c#ck measuring contests. Honestly I cringe reading it, men arguing abit owt and nowt.

I agree in that it certainly derails some threads but you’re wrong on this one. If you read the OP it was about us selling Mason Lino so nobody has gone off topic.

Sorry but you’re wrong on this one, it’s a fair if unpleasant and unnecessary debate. It can’t always be a love in but I’m surprised that after four wins people are still sniping at the club, or maybe I’m not surprised at all.

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 6:59 am  

vastman wrote:

I agree in that it certainly derails some threads but you’re wrong on this one. If you read the OP it was about us selling Mason Lino so nobody has gone off topic.

Sorry but you’re wrong on this one, it’s a fair if unpleasant and unnecessary debate. It can’t always be a love in but I’m surprised that after four wins people are still sniping at the club, or maybe I’m not surprised at all.

I genuinely thought the thread started about Lino’s kicking stats, nothing to do with when carter started as chairman etc. Fair do’s a Wigan fan came on saying they are after Lino. Anyways, I’m always wrong at home so nothing will change there!

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 7:01 am  

We did get a small fee for Ben. If anyone doesn’t like what they read swipe right and do something else. It’s a healthy debate. Am not stating that Michael is a selling chairman just that some of what people have posted is factually wrong. He’s done a decent job and is still learning a lot compared to other chairman that constantly throw money at clubs for little return.

[PopTart]

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 7:41 am  

vastman wrote:

I agree in that it certainly derails some threads but you’re wrong on this one. If you read the OP it was about us selling Mason Lino so nobody has gone off topic.

Sorry but you’re wrong on this one, it’s a fair if unpleasant and unnecessary debate. It can’t always be a love in but I’m surprised that after four wins people are still sniping at the club, or maybe I’m not surprised at all.

It wasn't. It was about Lino's kicking stars.

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 7:55 am  

I am not sniping at the club or MC just your ego. What you like to do is try to give an impression of MC which the facts do not back up, so any viewed criticism is a direct result of your clearly false statements. If you stuck to what is correct then nobody would need to come back and you could leave MC out of the thread.
With regards the post from the Wigan supporter there was nothing wrong he was just quoting a rumour like many do on this forum and on those of the players current club. It was you again with your over the top disgust that they should do this to us, what does it matter he clearly stated it was only a rumour.
With regards Mason when I saw his few games for Newcastle he didn’t look a leader on the field but was clearly an excellent goal kicker. I guess he was behind quite a few who took on that role but at Wakefield he has had to adapt which he is doing.

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:09 am  

Pat Bateman wrote:

I genuinely thought the thread started about Lino’s kicking stats, nothing to do with when carter started as chairman etc. Fair do’s a Wigan fan came on saying they are after Lino. Anyways, I’m always wrong at home so nothing will change there!

Same here

Re: Mason lino : Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:13 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I am not sniping at the club or MC just your ego. What you like to do is try to give an impression of MC which the facts do not back up, so any viewed criticism is a direct result of your clearly false statements. If you stuck to what is correct then nobody would need to come back and you could leave MC out of the thread.
With regards the post from the Wigan supporter there was nothing wrong he was just quoting a rumour like many do on this forum and on those of the players current club. It was you again with your over the top disgust that they should do this to us, what does it matter he clearly stated it was only a rumour.
With regards Mason when I saw his few games for Newcastle he didn’t look a leader on the field but was clearly an excellent goal kicker. I guess he was behind quite a few who took on that role but at Wakefield he has had to adapt which he is doing.

It’s not my ego and it’s not factual. It was a general comment that MC is not a selling Chairman. So I forgot a couple of players who were sold due to the financial mess left by Glover, big deal.

For reasons best known to yourself you’ve made a mountain out of a very small mole hill.

We are no longer a selling club for now, rejoice.