Re: 19 for Salford : Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:24 pm  

alegend wrote:

Grix at 6 lol we be slower in the haves than we are now just drop him

Be significantly quicker than cant run, beat a man or kick williams - who has been consistently the least useful member of the squad,

Grix has had some really good games but always been suspect under high ball

Re: 19 for Salford : Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:08 pm  

Kirmudgeonly wrote:

Be significantly quicker than cant run, beat a man or kick williams - who has been consistently the least useful member of the squad,

Grix has had some really good games but always been suspect under high ball

Funny. I thought that would be Sio or 'knock-on-athon' England.

Re: 19 for Salford : Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:47 pm  

Willzay wrote:

Funny. I thought that would be Sio or 'knock-on-athon' England.

Don't think you can compare Sio or England to Williams.
Sio is what Sio is, same with England and probably on considerably less coin than Williams.

Re: 19 for Salford : Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:29 am  

Willzay wrote:

Funny. I thought that would be Sio or 'knock-on-athon' England.

I see we've lost a game then?

[PopTart]

Re: 19 for Salford : Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:21 am  

Seriously. It seems some aren't happy until they can criticise individual players.
Must have been really disappointing watching us winning so many games.
Thank God for Salford's form and out injuries.

Re: 19 for Salford : Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:32 am  

King Street Cat wrote:

I presume you mean Grix at 6 with Miller being injured? If so, I'd go with that. Max at full back, Grix to 6 and Williams on the bench.

Yes that is what I meant. We look like we did when we dropped Miller...a bit lacking in fluidity and go forward. It's all a bit laboured. One thing I think Grix does well from Full back is attack the line but whether this would transfer to playing 6 I'm not sure. He's good at breaking a tackle though. Whatever, without Miller for the rest of the season (?) we need to look at livening the half back situation up. Without Miller, Finn doesn't play so well but also we had a depleted and beaten pack at Salford, so maybe a few bodies back there might help him

Re: 19 for Salford : Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:33 am  

PopTart wrote:

Seriously. It seems some aren't happy until they can criticise individual players.
Must have been really disappointing watching us winning so many games.
Thank God for Salford's form and out injuries.

How can you comment on a match without mentioning individual players be it a good or a bad performance?

Re: 19 for Salford : Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:56 pm  

Think it showed the importance of speed at 6 7 and 9 and full back .With Miller out we have got the slowest 6 7 and 9 and F B in S L . Know it's the best we got but think it's got to be addressed next year

Re: 19 for Salford : Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:01 pm  

alegend wrote:

Think it showed the importance of speed at 6 7 and 9 and full back .With Miller out we have got the slowest 6 7 and 9 and F B in S L . Know it's the best we got but think it's got to be addressed next year

Wood isn't slow what are you on about, Grix is ok over 20 meters I agree about Finn but we knew that. Williams though is a lot slower than I was expecting.

Re: 19 for Salford : Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:15 pm  

Agree about Williams lack of speed.I still think a full back should be abell to sprint more than 20 meters.I think the only clean break from full back as been the one by Jowitt against Salford away