Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 12:11 pm  

Officially now banned for 20 months. Now I have no problem with that sentence, especially he's served a provisional 12 month ban already. But you know what I'm going to say-



How the hell did Hardaker get off practically Scott free?

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 1:41 pm  

Different Solicitors, different judiciary, who knows.

Available from March 2019.

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 1:53 pm  

It's absolutely bizarre that the two sentences could be so different, literally don't get it

They both tested positive so what's the difference?

I don't think we will but I'd be more than happy if we re signed adam for next season

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:01 pm  

Shows how inept RFL are. Should both have the same ban.

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:06 pm  

wakeytrin wrote:

Shows how inept RFL are. Should both have the same ban.

Probably all down to the quality of the Wigan legal team.
They ran rings round the RFL lat time there was legal action involving them (when they managed to get a points deduction
halved for driving a bus through the salary cap).

Hardaker also has "previous" and I wasnt aware that Walker did.

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:39 pm  

We should hire the Wigan legal team regarding Newmarket.

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:43 pm  

wrencat1873 wrote:

Probably all down to the quality of the Wigan legal team.
They ran rings round the RFL lat time there was legal action involving them (when they managed to get a points deduction
halved for driving a bus through the salary cap).

Hardaker also has "previous" and I wasnt aware that Walker did.

Don't think there was any probable about it mate

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:44 pm  

wakeytrin wrote:

Shows how inept RFL are. Should both have the same ban.

Nothing to do with the RFL.

The ban is issued by the UK Anti-Doping Agency (UKAD).

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Thu Aug 23, 2018 5:56 pm  

Fully wrote:

Nothing to do with the RFL.

The ban is issued by the UK Anti-Doping Agency (UKAD).

It's amazing how many things some people want to blame the RFL for which are nothing to do with them

Re: Adam Walker vs Hardaker : Fri Aug 24, 2018 12:29 am  

wrencat1873 wrote:

Probably all down to the quality of the Wigan legal team.
They ran rings round the RFL lat time there was legal action involving them (when they managed to get a points deduction
halved for driving a bus through the salary cap).

Hardaker also has "previous" and I wasnt aware that Walker did.

Except the ban has nothing to do with the RFL, ban comes from the UKAD