RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
22 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Grass roots
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 9:57 am  

supercat wrote:
supercat Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:34 pm
Posts: 2193
Kettykat wrote:
Having my two grandchildren at football and rugby clubs I’ll have to disagree with you on that , the football club is falling over itself with money , in fact the brass their paying the lad to sit on a mower is eye watering, and something I’m seriously considering when retired . But the rugby club although in its infancy wouldn’t carry on without the parents/ grandparents substantial contributions . Football as a whole is awash with money and no surprise really amateur rugby league is on its uppers from where I’m standing, and needs some serious money pumping in from the top if the next generation of England stars are to be found .



Probably depends on the club to be fair and how run as a lot a run in different ways and some don’t have the other facilities that generate income to offset this.
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 10:15 am  

Luppylad wrote:
Luppylad Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 9:50 pm
Posts: 825
Is this on top of the money already payed per season if so not only will kids not play butsome clubs will struggle.both my lads play for a local amateur side and its a signing on fee of £75 per lad per seasonalready plus the the yougest pays £20 per month subs which over 12 months adds up.not sure what the eldest pays he is open age now and pays his own but if my lads where say still both in juniors id be looking at around £630 plus the new of rl charge just adds more on not to mention costs of travel and kits.

Think at times the rl are trying to discourage and make it harder for kids to play with this and the lowering how many academy teams there can be
Last edited by Luppylad on Thu May 13, 2021 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 10:46 am  

User avatarKettykat wrote:
Kettykat User avatar
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2018 7:07 am
Posts: 952
Don’t know the ins and out of all this ,it will all be made clear in the coming weeks/ months ,and to be honest I thought it as a little distraction from coach/player bashing and no more really . It is what it is and may turn out to be the making or breaking of the amateur game ,who knows ,certainly not me .
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 11:38 am  

User avatarjonh wrote:
jonh User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 3:21 pm
Posts: 18307
Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Even without factoring the impact of Covid the junior game is on its behind.

Since the impact of Covid established teams are struggling for players left right and centre.

If amateur clubs do well it will take them 8-10 years in my opinion to get playing numbers back up to where they were pre Covid.

As I understand it this payment will be on top of the standard league fees/insurances that clubs have to pay.

It is also applied to coaches and volunteers.

It smacks of an attempt to target the lifeblood of the game to assist with the deficit the RFL has to make up because of the last year.

I don’t think it’s unusual and I’m not saying this in any attempt to make myself look like a good guy as I think it sadly goes on all too often but I’ve personally had to buy players boots and cover subs/memberships during my time as a coach.

Adding further cost on with what will be no return is an absolute disgrace.

We have to encourage participation numbers not charge the people who want to play further for the pleasure of doing so.

Add to that it’s challenging enough to get volunteers you then want to charge them too!

I wouldn’t trust the RFL to run a bath never mind reinvest any revenue back into the community game.

The player performance pyramid relies on a strong base. That base is high numbers of participants. Attacking this by taxing it is the most short sited strategy I’ve maybe ever seen by a sport already struggling to attract junior players.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 11:43 am  

Sacred Cow wrote:
Sacred Cow Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 2726
Luppylad wrote:
Is this on top of the money already payed per season if so not only will kids not play butsome clubs will struggle.both my lads play for a local amateur side and its a signing on fee of £75 per lad already plus the the yougest pays £20 per month subs which over 1w months adds up.not sure what the eldest pays he is open age now and pays his own but if my lads where say still both in juniors id be looking at around £630 plus the new of rl charge just adds more on not to mention costs of travel and kits.

Think at times the rl are trying to discourage and make it harder for kids to play with this and the lowering how many academy teams there can be

Yes it's on top of existing fee's. It is effectively a membership payed to the RFL (not the clubs) for the privilage of playing, coaching or volunteering in RL and is going to purely fill a hole in the RFL's coffers. It will drive even more people away from the game at a time where it is already struggling. The RFL's incompetence knows no bounds and they don't seem to have realised that less participation equals less money from Sport England either.

Bit about it here...
https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/rfl-fee-plans-could-have-disastrous-effect-on-the-amateur-game-and-cause-exodus-of-players/?utm_content=buffer76436&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 11:44 am  

User avatarvastman wrote:
vastman User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Posts: 31721
Location: Poodle Power!
The amateur game has always been RL's Achilles heal. Neglected by the pro clubs and its governing body the RFL. Also poorly run itself, for every brilliant hard-working volunteer there is an incompetent, not as bad as it used to be but there is far too much infighting and like the RFL, BARLA is weak.

There needs to be one governing body but in all honesty, I can't see that happening, RL is far too parochial as a sport.

I think some of the more enlightened SL clubs would like to be more involved whilst others couldn't care less. But that wouldn't matter anyway because there are far too many empire builders in the amateur games who simply won't compromise and in some cases are openly hostile.

Ultimately history suggests that the pro clubs are the main culprits but with a strong RFL with strong leadership they could be bought to heal, that's basically what happens in Australi, where the amateur game is almost revered.

The first thing needed by any new NRL club is a strong amateur/school system, I think it's the last thing SL requires, hey ho.

Note, my experience of the modern amateur game is limited and it's 15 years since my son played in it so apologies if I sound harsh, it's just the way it looks from the outside looking in.
SUPPORT SWAG...
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 1:29 pm  

Luppylad wrote:
Luppylad Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 9:50 pm
Posts: 825
Sacred Cow wrote:
Yes it's on top of existing fee's. It is effectively a membership payed to the RFL (not the clubs) for the privilage of playing, coaching or volunteering in RL and is going to purely fill a hole in the RFL's coffers. It will drive even more people away from the game at a time where it is already struggling. The RFL's incompetence knows no bounds and they don't seem to have realised that less participation equals less money from Sport England either.

Bit about it here...
https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/rfl-fee-plans-could-have-disastrous-effect-on-the-amateur-game-and-cause-exodus-of-players/?utm_content=buffer76436&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer


Cheers...
Do the rfl want this great game to die and not exist anymore cos there going right way about it
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 1:31 pm  

Luppylad wrote:
Luppylad Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 9:50 pm
Posts: 825
jonh wrote:
Even without factoring the impact of Covid the junior game is on its behind.

Since the impact of Covid established teams are struggling for players left right and centre.

If amateur clubs do well it will take them 8-10 years in my opinion to get playing numbers back up to where they were pre Covid.

As I understand it this payment will be on top of the standard league fees/insurances that clubs have to pay.

It is also applied to coaches and volunteers.

It smacks of an attempt to target the lifeblood of the game to assist with the deficit the RFL has to make up because of the last year.

I don’t think it’s unusual and I’m not saying this in any attempt to make myself look like a good guy as I think it sadly goes on all too often but I’ve personally had to buy players boots and cover subs/memberships during my time as a coach.

Adding further cost on with what will be no return is an absolute disgrace.

We have to encourage participation numbers not charge the people who want to play further for the pleasure of doing so.

Add to that it’s challenging enough to get volunteers you then want to charge them too!

I wouldn’t trust the RFL to run a bath never mind reinvest any revenue back into the community game.

The player performance pyramid relies on a strong base. That base is high numbers of participants. Attacking this by taxing it is the most short sited strategy I’ve maybe ever seen by a sport already struggling to attract junior players.



God if id of known your bought players boots id of brought my lads to your club messed up there aint i :lol:
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 2:15 pm  

Manuel wrote:
Manuel Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:48 am
Posts: 619
Crigglestone All Blacks ARLFC have decided that all age groups, from tots to Open Age are playing for zero subs in 2021. We will take a hit but gladly invest what funds we can spare into the game to try to develop an increase in participation. There are grants out there that can help if you put your back into it. After 40 years as a volunteer, my enthusiasm is just as strong as are others at the club. The amateur game is the life blood of any professional sport and to kick it in the nuts is ill considered.
Wakefield has too many amateur clubs. Clubs are allowed to form at random with no consideration for the damage done to those with expense of facilities. Crigg, Eastmoor, Stanley and Normanton should be enough for players to be directed to for development and can form second teams if needed. One team clubs have no benefit, close down eventually and disperse. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Re: Grass roots Thu May 13, 2021 2:21 pm  

Luppylad wrote:
Luppylad Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 9:50 pm
Posts: 825
Manuel wrote:
Crigglestone All Blacks ARLFC have decided that all age groups, from tots to Open Age are playing for zero subs in 2021. We will take a hit but gladly invest what funds we can spare into the game to try to develop an increase in participation. There are grants out there that can help if you put your back into it. After 40 years as a volunteer, my enthusiasm is just as strong as are others at the club. The amateur game is the life blood of any professional sport and to kick it in the nuts is ill considered.
Wakefield has too many amateur clubs. Clubs are allowed to form at random with no consideration for the damage done to those with expense of facilities. Crigg, Eastmoor, Stanley and Normanton should be enough for players to be directed to for development and can form second teams if needed. One team clubs have no benefit, close down eventually and disperse. The more things change, the more they stay the same.


Normanton did cancel the yearly signing on fee for all age groups but where still paying subs but that goes to the lads of each team anyway and where not buying food at moment as teams cant stay to be fed
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 1873, 60sCat, alegend, BackSeatCoach, Brightside, cheshirecat57, djcool, Droopy, Dunkirk Spirit, Khlav Kalash, lampyboy, Luppylad, Lupsetbull, phe13, PopTart, REDWHITEANDBLUE, Roverman1, Trojan Horse, Two Points, vastman, Wakeywakeywakey and 304 guests

Quick Reply



Subject:
Message:

   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.

Return to Wakefield Trinity


When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
YOU HAVE RL CHAT OFF
RLFANS Match Centre
Thu 23rd Sep
SL RND: 26 Wigan0-8Leeds
Sun 19th Sep
SL RND: 25 Huddersfield42-24Leigh
CH RND: 22 Bradford22-36Whitehaven
CH RND: 22 Dewsbury21-14Oldham
CH RND: 22 Featherstone78-10Sheffield
CH RND: 22 Halifax10-12Batley
CH RND: 22 Swinton16-26Widnes
CH RND: 22 York30-22LondonB
L1 RND: 22 Doncaster31-10Hunslet
WSL RND: 16 St.HelensW52-0WiganW
WSL RND: 16 YorkW28-14CastlefordW
Sat 18th Sep
NRL RND: 27 Penrith8-6Parramatta
CH RND: 22 Newcastle12-82Toulouse
L1 RND: 22 Crusaders14-28Keighley
Fri 17th Sep
SL RND: 25 Leeds36-12Hull KR
SL RND: 25 Salford26-14St.Helens
SLRND: 25 Wakefield44-12Hull FC
SL RND: 25 Wigan12-8Catalans
NRL RND: 27 Manly42-6Sydney
Thu 16th Sep
SL RND: 25 Castleford24-40Warrington
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
National Rugby League 2021 ROUND : 25
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Melbourne 24 815 316 499 42
Penrith 24 640 280 360 42
Souths 24 775 453 322 40
Manly 24 744 492 252 32
Sydney 24 636 475 161 32
Parramatta 24 566 457 109 30
Newcastle 24 428 571 -143 24
Gold Coast 24 568 553 15 20
 
Cronulla 24 512 556 -44 20
Canberra 24 481 578 -97 20
St.George 24 474 616 -142 16
NZ Warriors 24 453 624 -171 16
Wests 24 500 714 -214 16
Brisbane 24 446 695 -249 14
NQL Cowboys 24 460 748 -288 14
Canterbury 24 340 710 -370 6
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Super League XXVI ROUND : 25
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Catalans 23 688 398 290 38 172.86 82.61
St.Helens 21 548 229 319 32 239.30 76.19
Warrington 21 588 354 234 31 166.10 73.81
Wigan 25 387 385 2 30 100.52 60
Leeds 24 556 440 116 26 126.36 54.17
Hull KR 20 497 458 39 20 108.52 50
 
Castleford 23 439 552 -113 22 79.53 47.83
Hull FC 21 409 476 -67 17 85.92 40.48
Huddersfield 24 460 516 -56 18 89.15 37.50
Wakefield 24 482 548 -66 18 87.96 37.50
Salford 22 402 586 -184 14 68.60 31.82
Leigh 22 356 870 -514 4 40.92 9.09
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Championship 2021 ROUND : 20
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Toulouse 13 616 112 504 26 550 100
Featherstone 19 817 254 563 34 321.65 94.74
Halifax 19 512 323 189 26 158.51 68.42
Bradford 18 483 455 28 24 106.15 66.67
LondonB 18 504 499 5 21 101 63.89
Batley 19 525 370 155 24 141.89 63.16
 
Whitehaven 20 447 496 -49 21 90.12 52.50
York 19 470 455 15 16 103.30 42.11
Widnes 19 458 509 -51 15 89.98 39.47
Newcastle 18 381 521 -140 13 73.13 36.11
Sheffield 18 382 553 -171 13 69.08 36.11
Dewsbury 19 308 570 -262 13 54.04 34.21
Oldham 19 270 691 -421 5 39.07 13.16
Swinton 20 354 719 -365 3 49.24 7.50
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred League One 2021 ROUND : 22
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Barrow 17 596 275 321 27 216.73 79.41
Workington 15 471 310 161 21 151.94 70
Doncaster 18 503 400 103 24 125.75 66.67
Keighley 19 640 399 241 25 160.40 65.79
Crusaders 18 553 438 115 22 126.26 61.11
Hunslet 19 572 466 106 20 122.75 52.63
 
Rochdale 17 505 488 17 17 103.48 50
Coventry 17 407 460 -53 12 88.48 35.29
LondonS 18 292 577 -285 7 50.61 19.44
West Wales 18 208 896 -688 1 23.21 2.78
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Womens Super League 2021 ROUND : 9
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
St.HelensW 7 370 36 334 12 1,027.78 85.71
WiganW 6 222 64 158 10 346.88 83.33
YorkW 6 186 102 84 8 182.35 66.67
CastlefordW 6 166 96 70 8 172.92 66.67
BradfordW 8 158 264 -106 6 59.85 37.50
Hudds W 7 104 288 -184 4 36.11 28.57
 
Wire W 8 150 334 -184 4 44.91 25
FeatherstoneW 8 122 338 -216 4 36.09 25
LeedsW 7 364 38 326 14 957.89 100
WakefieldW 7 50 332 -282 0 15.06 0
RLFANS Recent Posts




X
::::::::